SPGS: exam results

1. Also printed: A*–B 98.2% · A*–C 99.5% · A* count 241 · E count 2 · U count 0. An initial or provisional figure: a later publication may revise it. It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. Subject entries: 386 Where it’s from: PROVISIONAL, as at 25 September 2024; unresolved difference from announcement Worth knowing: Source version differs from the earlier announcement (60.9% A*, 88.6% A*/A); we do not know why the figures differ. Preserve both, do not average or silently replace frozen values. How the source defines it: Pure A-level subject entries in the 25 September sheet.
2. Also printed: A*–B 98.9% · Pupils with all A* grades 25. It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. Where it’s from: An annual report filed by the school Worth knowing: The source explicitly separates A-level from AS results. No qualification mixing or cohort denominator inferred; the 25-pupil attainment count is not an entry count. How the source defines it: 2015 A-level subject entries; a separate count describes girls attaining A* in all their A-levels.
3. It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. Where it’s from: An annual report filed by the school Worth knowing: The report explicitly labels these A-level results, separately from GCSE. Rounded summary; no entries, candidate denominator or remaining grade distribution supplied. How the source defines it: 2012 public A-level results, as reported for the year ended August 2012.
4. Also printed: E count 0 · U count 0. Subject entries: 392 Candidates: 108 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Original ISC school-reported survey; not a separately checked school publication. Preserve its published version and definition. No absent row or default-zero qualification field establishes whether a school offered that qualification. Different qualification populations and candidate counts must not be summed. How the source defines it: A-level subject entries; excluding General Studies where explicitly named by column; AS kept separate. Combined source scope is not silently converted into pure A-level data.
5. Also printed: E count 0 · U count 1. Subject entries: 359 Candidates: 102 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Original ISC school-reported survey; not a separately checked school publication. Preserve its published version and definition. No absent row or default-zero qualification field establishes whether a school offered that qualification. Different qualification populations and candidate counts must not be summed. How the source defines it: A-level subject entries; excluding General Studies where explicitly named by column; AS kept separate. Combined source scope is not silently converted into pure A-level data.
6. Also printed: E count 1 · U count 0. Subject entries: 329 Candidates: 94 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Original ISC school-reported survey; not a separately checked school publication. Preserve its published version and definition. No absent row or default-zero qualification field establishes whether a school offered that qualification. Different qualification populations and candidate counts must not be summed. How the source defines it: A-level subject entries; excluding General Studies where explicitly named by column; AS kept separate. Combined source scope is not silently converted into pure A-level data.
7. Also printed: E count 0 · U count 0. Subject entries: 309 Candidates: 90 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: ISC school-reported survey; this is an original ISC publication, not a separately checked original school results sheet. Workbook worksheet identifies final 2 October 2006; landing-page release dates describe earlier initial results. No default-zero IB columns are treated as evidence of historical qualification applicability. How the source defines it: A-level subject entries excluding General Studies; separately printed qualification-specific candidate count. A and AS pupils may overlap and must not be added.
8. Also printed: A–B grades 96.0% · A–B entries · cumulative count 340 · A 79.4% · Pass count 353 · Pass Rate 99.7. Subject entries: 354 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Historical A–E grade scale; A* did not exist in this table. How the source defines it: School-published Advanced Level subject entries.

1. Also printed: A*–E 100% · U count 0. What it counts: Pure A-level subject entries in the 25 September sheet. Subject entries: 386 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Source version differs from the earlier announcement (60.9% A*, 88.6% A*/A); we do not know why the figures differ. Preserve both, do not average or silently replace frozen values. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Pure A-level subject entries in the 25 September sheet.

1. Also printed: A*–E 100% · U count 0. What it counts: Pure A-level subject entries; excludes two Chinese Pre-U entries. Subject entries: 376 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Earlier combined results-day claim (53/87/97.1) and this final pure A-level table have different publication dates and qualification populations. They cannot be used interchangeably. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Pure A-level subject entries; excludes two Chinese Pre-U entries.

1. Also printed: A*–E 100% · U count 0. What it counts: Pure A-level subject entries; page 3 excludes the 72 Pre-U entries shown separately on page 2. Subject entries: 295 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Percentages copied from the school table; no conversion from Pre-U. 2022 was an examined year under transitional grading. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Pure A-level subject entries; page 3 excludes the 72 Pre-U entries shown separately on page 2.

1. Also printed: A*–E 100% · U count 0. What it counts: 275 pure A-level subject entries; 2021 teacher-assessed grades. Subject entries: 275 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Pre-U and the combined table appear on separate pages and are not included. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: 275 pure A-level subject entries; 2021 teacher-assessed grades.

1. Also printed: A*–E 100% · U count 0. What it counts: Pure A-level entries;2020centre-assessed/corrected grades, not examinations. Subject entries: 285 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: The adjacent combined qualification table uses a different population. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Pure A-level entries;2020centre-assessed/corrected grades, not examinations.

Every row: Ranges and bounds such as “over 90%” are shown as printed, so they aren’t charted as exact figures. Where it’s from: Source-specific recovery; new pure-qualification reconstruction How the source defines it: Pure A-level subject entries extracted from the school annual table.

1. Also printed: A*–D 99.7% · A*–E 100% · C count 11 · D count 2 · E count 1 · U count 0. It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: Pure A-level subject entries extracted from the school annual table. Subject entries: 304 Worth knowing: Existing2019 headline anchor52.1/87.7/97.1 differs from this304-entry source population; retain as an explicitly named source variant, excluded from automatic comparison.
2. Also printed: A*–D 100% · A*–E 100% · C count 9 · D count 1 · E count 0 · U count 0. What it counts: A-level subject entries Subject entries: 346 Worth knowing: The arithmetic removes Pre-U awards from a combined table; it does not convert Pre-U into A-level grades.

1. Also printed: A*–E 100% · U count 0. What it counts: Pure A-level table; Pre-U appears separately on page2. Subject entries: 242 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: The source cumulative row contains72.0under E despite zeroE grades. That inconsistent field is not ingested; the shown top three bands match their counts. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Pure A-level table; Pre-U appears separately on page2.

Every row: What it counts: A-level subject entries

1. Also printed: A*–D 99.7% · A*–E 100% · C count 2 · D count 0 · E count 1 · U count 0. Subject entries: 355 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Supplements the existing60.0/93.8headline with source-defined grade counts and further bands. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Pure A-level entries in the school final subject table.
2. Where it’s from: Source-specific recovery; new lower band and annual table variant Worth knowing: Archived page fetched through 20141011024520 replay; HTML cache comment dated 2014-10-11 14:36:24. No denominator inferred from decimals. Three headline bands already recorded; A*–C100 is an omitted lower cumulative band. How the source defines it: School A Levels results page; All row, four individual grade shares summed for cumulative percentages.

1. It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: School A Levels results page; All row, four individual grade shares summed for cumulative percentages. Where it’s from: Source-specific recovery; new lower band and annual table variant Worth knowing: Archived page fetched through 20141011024520 replay; HTML cache comment dated 2014-10-11 14:36:24. No denominator inferred from decimals. This later table differs from the existing explicitly provisional September 2013 announcement (42/92.4/98.3); preserve a source variant. How the source defines it: School A Levels results page; All row, four individual grade shares summed for cumulative percentages.

Every row: It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: A-level subject entries; excluding General Studies where explicitly named by column; AS kept separate. Combined source scope is not silently converted into pure A-level data. Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Original ISC school-reported survey; not a separately checked school publication. Preserve its published version and definition. No absent row or default-zero qualification field establishes whether a school offered that qualification. Different qualification populations and candidate counts must not be summed. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: A-level subject entries; excluding General Studies where explicitly named by column; AS kept separate. Combined source scope is not silently converted into pure A-level data.

1. Also printed: A–B 98% · A–C 99.2% · A–D 100% · A–E 100% · U count 0. Subject entries: 392 Candidates: 108
2. Also printed: A–B 98.3% · A–C 99.7% · A–D 99.7% · A–E 99.7% · U count 1. Subject entries: 359 Candidates: 102
3. Also printed: A–B 98.8% · A–C 99.4% · A–D 99.7% · A–E 100% · U count 0. Subject entries: 329 Candidates: 94

1. Also printed: A–B 97.7% · A–C 100% · A–D 100% · A–E 100% · U count 0. It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: A-level subject entries excluding General Studies; separately printed qualification-specific candidate count. A and AS pupils may overlap and must not be added. Subject entries: 309 Candidates: 90 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: ISC school-reported survey; this is an original ISC publication, not a separately checked original school results sheet. Workbook worksheet identifies final 2 October 2006; landing-page release dates describe earlier initial results. No default-zero IB columns are treated as evidence of historical qualification applicability. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: A-level subject entries excluding General Studies; separately printed qualification-specific candidate count. A and AS pupils may overlap and must not be added.

1. It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: A-level grade entries in the Sunday Times Parent Power report. Where it’s from: Source-specific recovery; new source Worth knowing: Contemporary report, publicationyear and observationyear2005. A-only and full denominator not supplied. How the source defines it: A-level grade entries in the Sunday Times Parent Power report.

Every row: It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: ISC GCE A-level entries, including General Studies Where it’s from: Counts checked against an archived copy; the qualifications it covers are kept as printed Worth knowing: AAL columns are explicitly defined by ISC as GCE A-level including General Studies. ALG excludes General Studies; GAL mixes A and AS levels and is not used. The denominator is AAL Ents. A* did not exist at A-level in this examination year and is not recorded as zero. Percentages are calculated from grade counts and rounded to one decimal place. Conflicting school publications retain their own separate records. Verification applies to the reported source population; this addition is not promoted to matched whole-school comparison evidence. How the source defines it: GCE A-level entries including General Studies in the contemporary ISC AAL total; AS-level and VCE entries excluded.

1. Also printed: A–C 98.6% · A–D 99.7% · A–E 99.7% · U count 1. Subject entries: 354
2. Also printed: A–C 100.0% · A–D 100.0% · A–E 100.0% · U count 0. Subject entries: 308

1. It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: A-level entries as reported to the Financial Times; General Studies scope unverified Where it’s from: Contemporary newspaper grade percentage verified; General Studies scope unresolved Worth knowing: Financial Times telephone survey of school heads. Ranking is a separate reputational ranking: table order is not an A-grade ranking. Percentages are shares of examination grades, not pupil rates. General Studies inclusion is discussed as varying between schools; no per-school count or harmonised exclusion is supplied. The article explicitly discusses A-level examinations sat in 1990, calls St Paul's 1990 an unusually good examination year and compares Winchester/Eton 1990 examination grades. A* did not exist at A-level in1990; no A* value is recorded. How the source defines it: A-level entries as reported to the Financial Times; General Studies scope unverified

Every row: What it counts: Numbered grade entries

1. Also printed: Grade 7 count 22 · Grade 8 count 136 · Grade 9 count 894. An initial or provisional figure: a later publication may revise it. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Subject entries: 1,056 Where it’s from: Provisional; file dated 29 September 2025 Worth knowing: Page 2 Chinese figures differ from the Chinese row on page 1; neither lettered table is adopted here. This page 3 numbered table is retained with its own population. How the source defines it: Numbered-grade entries only, excluding the lettered Chinese subject population.
2. Also printed: Grade 7 count 34 · Grade 8 count 93 · Grade 9 count 864. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. Subject entries: 1,007 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: The document has cross-page inconsistencies: geography has 53 combined entries but 54 numbered entries; the biology row lists 104 entries but 106 grades. These figures remain a source variant pending clarification. How the source defines it: Published numbered-grade table, excluding lettered Chinese results.
3. Also printed: Grade 7 count 25 · Grade 8 count 86 · Grade 9 count 917. An initial or provisional figure: a later publication may revise it. Awarded in 2020–21, when exams were cancelled and schools assessed grades, so kept out of comparisons with exam years. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Subject entries: 1,030 Where it’s from: Provisional 2021 teacher-assessed grades Worth knowing: The 23 Chinese lettered-grade entries are excluded; the combined total is 1,053. How the source defines it: 1,030 numbered-grade entries; 2021 teacher-assessed grades.
4. Also printed: Grade 7 count 18 · Grade 8 count 119 · Grade 9 count 840. An initial or provisional figure: a later publication may revise it. Awarded in 2020–21, when exams were cancelled and schools assessed grades, so kept out of comparisons with exam years. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Subject entries: 977 Where it’s from: Provisional 2020 centre-assessed / corrected grades Where it’s from: Provisional 2020 centre-assessed/corrected grades Worth knowing: Not an examined cohort. The mixed qualification-grade summary uses a different denominator. How the source defines it: 977 numbered-grade entries, excluding 26 Chinese lettered-grade entries; 2020 centre-assessed/corrected grades.
5. Also printed: Grade 7 count 30 · Grade 8 count 109 · Grade 9 count 814. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Subject entries: 958 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Keep separate from whole-school mixed lettered/numbered equivalence percentages. How the source defines it: Numbered-grade entries only; the document does not include a lettered-grade component.
6. Also printed: Grade 1 awards 0 · Grade 2 awards 0 · Grade 7 count 7 · Grade 8 count 32 · Grade 9 count 196. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. Subject entries: 235 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: The earlier news announcement gives 82.6% grade 9, whereas this PDF gives 83.4%. Revision cause unestablished; this source version is retained separately. How the source defines it: Numbered-grade entries only: Greek, geography, Latin and mathematics.

1. Also printed: grades 9–4 100% · grades 9–5 100% · grades 9–6 99.8% · Grade 9 count 894. What it counts: Numbered-grade entries only, excluding the lettered Chinese subject population. Subject entries: 1,056 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Page 2 Chinese figures differ from the Chinese row on page 1; neither lettered table is adopted here. This page 3 numbered table is retained with its own population. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Numbered-grade entries only, excluding the lettered Chinese subject population.

1. Also printed: Grade 9 count 902. An initial or provisional figure: a later publication may revise it. Where it’s from: Provisional; file dated 25 September 2024 Worth knowing: Published grade counts supplement the existing numbered-grade percentage row; no denominator mixing. How the source defines it: Numbered-grade distribution of 1,079 entries, excluding 24 lettered Chinese entries.
2. Also printed: Grade 9 count 822. Subject entries: 1,004 Where it’s from: FINAL; file dated 27 November 2023 Worth knowing: The frozen row retains 1,023 combined entries alongside numbered-grade percentages. This additive observation records the original numbered table denominator without changing the frozen row. Existing percentage bands are separately source-verified. How the source defines it: 1,004 numbered-grade entries; the 19 lettered Chinese entries are separate.
3. Also printed: Candidates all grade scales 99 · Grade a count 183 · Grade b count 21 · Grade c count 4 · Grade d count 0 · Grade e count 0 · Grade f count 0 · Grade g count 0 · Grade u count 0. Subject entries: 914 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Original ISC school-reported survey; not a separately checked school publication. Preserve its published version and definition. No absent row or default-zero qualification field establishes whether a school offered that qualification. Different qualification populations and candidate counts must not be summed. How the source defines it: Combined full and short GCSE courses; letter grades kept separate. Candidate count covers all grade scales in source, not this grade subset alone.
4. Also printed: Candidates all grade scales 96 · Grade a count 136 · Grade b count 27 · Grade c count 0 · Grade d count 0 · Grade e count 0 · Grade f count 0 · Grade g count 0 · Grade u count 0. Subject entries: 881 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Original ISC school-reported survey; not a separately checked school publication. Preserve its published version and definition. No absent row or default-zero qualification field establishes whether a school offered that qualification. Different qualification populations and candidate counts must not be summed. How the source defines it: Combined full and short GCSE courses; letter grades kept separate. Candidate count covers all grade scales in source, not this grade subset alone.
5. Also printed: Candidates all grade scales 98 · Grade a count 118 · Grade b count 9 · Grade c count 0 · Grade d count 0 · Grade e count 0 · Grade f count 0 · Grade g count 0 · Grade u count 0. Subject entries: 908 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Original ISC school-reported survey; not a separately checked school publication. Preserve its published version and definition. No absent row or default-zero qualification field establishes whether a school offered that qualification. Different qualification populations and candidate counts must not be summed. How the source defines it: Combined full and short GCSE courses; letter grades kept separate. Candidate count covers all grade scales in source, not this grade subset alone.

Every row: What it counts: Numbered grade entries Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts

1. Also printed: Grade 7 count 39 · Grade 8 count 121 · Grades 9–3 100% · grades 9–4 100% · grades 9–5 99.9% · grades 9–6 99.7% · Grade 9 count 902. Subject entries: 1,079 Worth knowing: Published grade counts supplement the existing numbered-grade percentage row; no denominator mixing. The retrieved source explicitly supplies1079numbered entries and a cumulative row83.6/94.8/98.4/99.7/99.9/100/100. School Chinese24letter entries remain separate. Headline percentages already in the anchor; lower bands and linked denominator are additions. How the source defines it: Numbered-grade distribution of 1,079 entries, excluding 24 lettered Chinese entries.
2. Also printed: Grade 7 count 40 · Grade 8 count 132 · Grades 9–3 100% · grades 9–4 99.9% · grades 9–5 99.9% · grades 9–6 99.5% · Grade 9 count 822. Subject entries: 1,004 Worth knowing: The frozen row retains 1,023 combined entries alongside numbered-grade percentages. This additive observation records the original numbered table denominator without changing the frozen row. Existing percentage bands are separately source-verified. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: 1,004 numbered-grade entries; the 19 lettered Chinese entries are separate.

1. Subject entries: 1,023 Where it’s from: P final sheet

1. Also printed: grades 9–4 100% · grades 9–5 99.9% · grades 9–6 99.6% · Grade 9 count 864. What it counts: Published numbered-grade table, excluding lettered Chinese results. Subject entries: 1,007 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: The document has cross-page inconsistencies: geography has 53 combined entries but 54 numbered entries; the biology row lists 104 entries but 106 grades. These figures remain a source variant pending clarification. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Published numbered-grade table, excluding lettered Chinese results.

1. Also printed: grades 9–4 100% · grades 9–5 100% · grades 9–6 100% · Grade 9 count 917. What it counts: 1,030 numbered-grade entries; 2021 teacher-assessed grades. Subject entries: 1,030 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: The 23 Chinese lettered-grade entries are excluded; the combined total is 1,053. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: 1,030 numbered-grade entries; 2021 teacher-assessed grades.

1. Also printed: grades 9–4 100% · grades 9–5 100% · grades 9–6 100% · Grade 9 count 840. What it counts: 977 numbered-grade entries, excluding 26 Chinese lettered-grade entries; 2020 centre-assessed/corrected grades. Subject entries: 977 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Not an examined cohort. The mixed qualification-grade summary uses a different denominator. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: 977 numbered-grade entries, excluding 26 Chinese lettered-grade entries; 2020 centre-assessed/corrected grades.

1. Also printed: grades 9–4 100% · grades 9–5 100% · grades 9–6 100% · Grade 9 count 814. What it counts: Numbered-grade entries only; the document does not include a lettered-grade component. Subject entries: 958 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Keep separate from whole-school mixed lettered/numbered equivalence percentages. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Numbered-grade entries only; the document does not include a lettered-grade component.

1. Also printed: Grade 8 count 32 · Grades 9–3 100% · grades 9–4 100% · grades 9–5 100% · grades 9–6 100% · Grade 9 count 196. What it counts: Numbered-grade entries only: Greek, geography, Latin and mathematics. Subject entries: 235 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: The earlier news announcement gives 82.6% grade 9, whereas this PDF gives 83.4%. Revision cause unestablished; this source version is retained separately. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Numbered-grade entries only: Greek, geography, Latin and mathematics.

Every row: What it counts: Legacy grade entries

1. Also printed: D count 0 · E count 0 · U count 0. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. Subject entries: 1,074 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Printed grade counts sum1075against printed entry total1074. Religious Education row prints23entries but20A*+4A. Preserve this unresolved source inconsistency; no correction or inferred denominator. How the source defines it: School-published lettered-grade totals and percentages.
2. Also printed: D count 0 · E count 0 · U count 0. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Subject entries: 1,032 Where it’s from: FINAL school table Worth knowing: No pupil denominator is printed. How the source defines it: GCSE and IGCSE lettered-grade subject entries.
3. Also printed: D count 2 · E count 0 · U count 0. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Subject entries: 1,092 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Current original URL returns404; public archived PDF was retrieved and rendered. No pupil denominator is printed. How the source defines it: GCSE and IGCSE lettered-grade entries in archived original school subject table.
4. Also printed: Pupils with all A* grades 60. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. Where it’s from: An annual report filed by the school Worth knowing: The source reports 90% at A* with less precision than the 98.9% A*/A figure. No entry or pupil denominator inferred. How the source defines it: 2015 GCSE/IGCSE subject entries; a separate count describes girls attaining all A* grades.
5. An initial or provisional figure: a later publication may revise it. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Where it’s from: Provisional announcement,1September2014 Worth knowing: No entry denominator or grade counts are printed. How the source defines it: School-published GCSE/IGCSE lettered-grade entry percentages; provisional.
6. Also printed: A 8.20754716981% · B 0.566037735849% · C 0.0%. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Original HTML preserves more decimal places than the rounded chart labels. No denominators reverse-engineered. How the source defines it: Published lettered GCSE/IGCSE grade percentages; entry counts and pupil denominators not supplied.
7. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. Where it’s from: An annual report filed by the school Worth knowing: A rounded subject-result band. No entry or pupil count, separate A* band or lower-grade distribution is supplied here. How the source defines it: 2012 public GCSE results, A*/A band.
8. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Where it’s from: Original publication How the source defines it: Published GCSE grade percentages; no entries or pupil denominator given.
9. Also printed: Year inferred Yes. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. The year has been worked out from context rather than stated in the source; the dating note explains why. Where it’s from: Unclear what this counts Worth knowing: Page says this year; 2008 is inferred from its archive context and requires a dated original before annual-comparison eligibility. How the source defines it: Published GCSE entry percentage in an undated archived school page.
10. Also printed: A*–C 100% · Candidate five or more A* c 100% · Candidates 98 · Candidates five or more A* c 98 · D count 0 · E count 0 · F count 0 · G count 0 · U count 0. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. Subject entries: 901 Candidates: 98 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: ISC school-reported survey; this is an original ISC publication, not a separately checked original school results sheet. Workbook worksheet identifies final 2 October 2006; landing-page release dates describe earlier initial results. No default-zero IB columns are treated as evidence of historical qualification applicability. How the source defines it: Combined full and short GCSE courses in the ISC source; not a full-course-only result. Published candidate achievement and subject-grade percentages have separate denominators.
11. Also printed: A* and A grades · published count 860 · A Star B Count 882. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Subject entries: 886 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: The full source prints886entries and cumulative counts; this extends actual outcome coverage to2003. It leaves the intervening years unaccounted for. How the source defines it: Published GCSE grade entries for the school year group labelled6th; lettered grades.

1. Also printed: A*–D 100% · A*–E 100% · U count 0. What it counts: GCSE and IGCSE lettered-grade subject entries. Subject entries: 1,032 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: No pupil denominator is printed. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: GCSE and IGCSE lettered-grade subject entries.

1. Also printed: A*–D 100% · A*–E 100% · U count 0. What it counts: GCSE and IGCSE lettered-grade entries in archived original school subject table. Subject entries: 1,092 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Current original URL returns404; public archived PDF was retrieved and rendered. No pupil denominator is printed. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: GCSE and IGCSE lettered-grade entries in archived original school subject table.

1. Where it’s from: S school-published

Every row: What it counts: Legacy grade entries Where it’s from: Source-specific recovery; new cumulative fields from retrieved archive Worth knowing: Full-school A*–B and A*–C round to100.0; the archived shares contain more precision than the visual chart. No denominator inferred from fractional decimals. How the source defines it: School archived annual All row; original A*, A, B, C shares. Cumulative percentages are sums rounded once to one decimal.

1. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: Legacy grade entries Where it’s from: Source-specific recovery; new source Worth knowing: Secondary source; the author says SPGS was individually added rather than present in the Telegraph table. Existing filed-report2012 record states AA98%; preserve conflict pending primary annual-school-table/year reconciliation. How the source defines it: GCSE percentages in dated LondonPreprep table; school added individually to a Telegraph-derived table.

1. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: Legacy grade entries Where it’s from: Source-specific recovery; new source Worth knowing: Capture28July2011 predates summer2011results; the page calls A-level A*new and directly links6thresultssummer2010.pdf and8thresultssummer2010.pdf, anchoring observationyear2010. Source-level whole-school GCSE/IGCSE inclusion not independently itemised. How the source defines it: GCSE papers in the school archived results announcement.

Every row: This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: Legacy grade entries Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Original ISC school-reported survey; not a separately checked school publication. Preserve its published version and definition. No absent row or default-zero qualification field establishes whether a school offered that qualification. Different qualification populations and candidate counts must not be summed. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Combined full and short GCSE courses; letter grades kept separate. Candidate count covers all grade scales in source, not this grade subset alone.

1. Also printed: A*–F 100% · A*–G 100% · Candidates all grade scales 99 · Grade a count 183 · Grade b count 21 · Grade c count 4 · Grade d count 0 · Grade e count 0 · Grade f count 0 · Grade g count 0 · Grade u count 0. Subject entries: 914
2. Also printed: A*–F 100% · A*–G 100% · Candidates all grade scales 96 · Grade a count 136 · Grade b count 27 · Grade c count 0 · Grade d count 0 · Grade e count 0 · Grade f count 0 · Grade g count 0 · Grade u count 0. Subject entries: 881
3. Also printed: A*–F 100% · A*–G 100% · Candidates all grade scales 98 · Grade a count 118 · Grade b count 9 · Grade c count 0 · Grade d count 0 · Grade e count 0 · Grade f count 0 · Grade g count 0 · Grade u count 0. Subject entries: 908

1. Also printed: A*–D 100% · A*–E 100% · F count 0 · G count 0 · U count 0. What it counts: Combined full and short GCSE courses in the ISC source; not a full-course-only result. Published candidate achievement and subject-grade percentages have separate denominators. Subject entries: 901 Candidates: 98 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: ISC school-reported survey; this is an original ISC publication, not a separately checked original school results sheet. Workbook worksheet identifies final 2 October 2006; landing-page release dates describe earlier initial results. No default-zero IB columns are treated as evidence of historical qualification applicability. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Combined full and short GCSE courses in the ISC source; not a full-course-only result. Published candidate achievement and subject-grade percentages have separate denominators.

Every row: This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: Legacy grade entries Where it’s from: Counts checked against an archived copy; the qualifications it covers are kept as printed Worth knowing: The annual return is used, never the separate five-year average. Counts and cumulative percentages retain the ISC aggregation basis. The denominator is the printed annual Ents field, or the sum of the complete printed grade distribution where no separate total is printed. Candidate counts are not percentage denominators. Blank grade counts remain unrecorded; explicit zeros are retained. Percentages are calculated from grade counts and rounded to one decimal place. Conflicting school publications retain their own separate records. Verification applies to the reported source population; this addition is not promoted to matched whole-school comparison evidence. How the source defines it: GCSE grade units reported in the contemporary ISC full/short-course return. Complete IGCSE inclusion is unverified; this source population is separate from school-wide GCSE/IGCSE totals.

1. Also printed: B count 28. Subject entries: 805 Candidates: 88
2. Also printed: B count 30 · C count 4. Subject entries: 856 Candidates: 93
3. Also printed: A*–D 100.0% · A*–E 100.0% · A*–F 100.0% · A*–G 100.0% · B count 22 · C count 4 · D count 0 · E count 0 · F count 0 · G count 0 · U count 0. Subject entries: 886 Candidates: 96
4. Also printed: A*–D 100.0% · A*–E 100.0% · A*–F 100.0% · A*–G 100.0% · B count 40 · C count 9 · D count 1 · E count 0 · F count 0 · G count 0 · U count 0. Subject entries: 816 Candidates: 89
5. Also printed: B count 28 · C count 1. Subject entries: 861 Candidates: 96

Every row: This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: Legacy grade entries Where it’s from: Contemporary newspaper grade shares verified; original population and source versions retained Worth knowing: Original PDF page and crop visually checked; percentages are grade-entry shares, pupils are a separate denominator. The GCSE label does not tell us whether every IGCSE result is included. How the source defines it: GCSE grade-entry percentages as reported to The Times; complete IGCSE inclusion unverified. Pupil counts are separate from grade-entry denominators.

1. Candidates: 78
2. Candidates: 88
3. Candidates: 82

1. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: Legacy grade entries Candidates: 80 Where it’s from: Contemporary newspaper grade percentages verified; complete qualification scope unresolved Worth knowing: The printed table headings and school row were visually checked against the newspaper scan. Grade percentages are copied as published, not calculated using the pupil count. Other source versions remain separate. How the source defines it: GCSE grades as reported to The Times. Pupil count is not an entry denominator. Full IGCSE inclusion is unverified.

1. What it counts: GCSE examination entries reported to ISIS; candidate count is not the percentage denominator. Candidates: 88 Where it’s from: Source-specific recovery; new source Worth knowing: The text explicitly says every exam entry at each of the seven leading schools earned at least C; this is an entry percentage, not five-good-GCSE pupils. How the source defines it: GCSE examination entries reported to ISIS; candidate count is not the percentage denominator.

1. This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series. What it counts: Legacy grade entries Candidates: 81 Where it’s from: Source-specific recovery; new source Worth knowing: Published 2 September 1995. we do not know whether every IGCSE result is included; preserve the reported population. How the source defines it: GCSE grades reported in the ISIS table; candidate count is context, not the percentage denominator.

1. Also printed: Pre-U M1 awards 1 · Pre-U M2 awards 0 · Pre-U M3 awards 0 · Pre-U P1 awards 0. Subject entries: 2 Where it’s from: FINAL, file dated 7 November 2023 Worth knowing: Very small subject population; not a school-wide sixth-form performance measure. How the source defines it: Chinese Mandarin Pre-U Principal Subject only; two entries.
2. Also printed: Pre-U M1 awards 1 · Pre-U M2 awards 0 · Pre-U M3 awards 0 · Pre-U P1 awards 0. An initial or provisional figure: a later publication may revise it. Subject entries: 72 Where it’s from: provisional school sheet Worth knowing: Published totals and cumulative percentages. P2/P3 columns are not printed, so none is inferred. How the source defines it: Pre-U Principal Subject entries, separately published; no A-level equivalence.
3. Also printed: Pre-U M1 awards 1 · Pre-U M2 awards 0 · Pre-U M3 awards 0 · Pre-U P1 awards 0. An initial or provisional figure: a later publication may revise it. Subject entries: 100 Where it’s from: Provisional 2021 teacher-assessed grades Worth knowing: Not an examined cohort; not A-level equivalent grades. How the source defines it: 100 Pre-U Principal Subject entries; 2021 teacher-assessed grades.
4. Also printed: Pre-U M1 awards 1 · Pre-U M2 awards 0 · Pre-U M3 awards 0 · Pre-U P1 awards 0. An initial or provisional figure: a later publication may revise it. Subject entries: 96 Where it’s from: 2020CAG; provisional school table Worth knowing: No comparison with examined-year performance without explicit qualification. How the source defines it: Separate Pre-U entries;2020centre-assessed/corrected grades.
5. Also printed: D1–M2 98.9% · D1–M3 100% · Pre-U M1 awards 2 · Pre-U M2 awards 2 · Pre-U M3 awards 1 · Pre-U P1 awards 0. Subject entries: 94 Where it’s from: School PDF source version; difference from announcement unresolved Worth knowing: The earlier announcement gives69.2% D1/D2 whereas this table gives70.2%; reason unestablished. Retain the table as its own source version. How the source defines it: Separate Principal Subject Pre-U entries.
6. Also printed: Pre-U M1 awards 1 · Pre-U M2 awards 0 · Pre-U M3 awards 0 · Pre-U P1 awards 0. Subject entries: 46 Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: The adjacent392-entry table combines A-level and Pre-U equivalents and is not a pure A-level result. How the source defines it: Separately labelled Pre-U table: Chinese Mandarin, English Literature and French.

1. Also printed: Pre-U M2 awards 0 · Pre-U M3 awards 0 · Pre-U P1 awards 0. What it counts: Chinese Mandarin Pre-U Principal Subject only; two entries. Subject entries: 2 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Very small subject population; not a school-wide sixth-form performance measure. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Chinese Mandarin Pre-U Principal Subject only; two entries.

1. Also printed: Pre-U M2 awards 0 · Pre-U M3 awards 0 · Pre-U P1 awards 0. What it counts: Pre-U Principal Subject entries, separately published; no A-level equivalence. Subject entries: 72 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Published totals and cumulative percentages. P2/P3 columns are not printed, so none is inferred. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Pre-U Principal Subject entries, separately published; no A-level equivalence.

1. Also printed: Pre-U M2 awards 0 · Pre-U M3 awards 0 · Pre-U P1 awards 0. What it counts: 100 Pre-U Principal Subject entries; 2021 teacher-assessed grades. Subject entries: 100 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: Not an examined cohort; not A-level equivalent grades. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: 100 Pre-U Principal Subject entries; 2021 teacher-assessed grades.

1. Also printed: Pre-U M2 awards 0 · Pre-U M3 awards 0 · Pre-U P1 awards 0. What it counts: Separate Pre-U entries;2020centre-assessed/corrected grades. Subject entries: 96 Where it’s from: Recovered from this source; some figures are our calculation from its counts Worth knowing: No comparison with examined-year performance without explicit qualification. Each cumulative percentage = 100 × sum of the named grade counts / published examination entries, rounded to one decimal. Counts were already in the source-backed public record; these are omitted percentage fields, not newly discovered examination years. How the source defines it: Separate Pre-U entries;2020centre-assessed/corrected grades.