Back to comparison

St Paul’s Girls’ School · 2017

A-level 2017 · additional cumulative grade percentages · 2017 · A-level · A*–E

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Source references or checks are recorded, but verification of this particular figure against the original is incomplete.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Pure A-level subject entries extracted from the school annual table.

Type of result: Examination grade distribution.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

A count
145
% A* · %
41.6
% A*–A · %
83.5
% A*–B · %
97.1
% A*–C · %
99.7
A* count
144
% A*–D · %
100
% A*–E · %
100
B count
47
Published basis
Pure A-level subject entries extracted from the school annual table.
C count
9
D count
1
E count
0
Entries
346
Qualification
A-level
Note
The arithmetic removes Pre-U awards from a combined table; it does not convert Pre-U into A-level grades.
Outcome type
Examination grade distribution
Population basis
Pure A-level subject entries extracted from the school annual table.
Publication status
Source-specific recovery; new pure-qualification reconstruction
Grade scale
A*–E
U count
0
Year
2017
Publication note

Source-specific recovery; new pure-qualification reconstruction

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Ranges and figures such as “over 90%” are retained as reported and are not exact chart values.

Where was this published?

Checked against the original publication

* · 2017.

St Paul’s Girls’ School: A-level results 2017 · Single PDF page; subject rows and combined total

Checked 2026-09-09. Source excerpt: Combined392 entries [183,151,48,9,1,0,0] less explicitly separate46 Pre-U entries mapped only to remove their contribution [D1+D2=39,D3=6,M1+M2=1,M3=0,P1=0]. This leaves pure A-level subject entries; A-level subject rows independently reproduce the residual.

Can I compare this figure?

% A* · bounds/estimates not eligible

Reported value: 41.6. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: A-level subject entries. Recorded total for this measure: 346. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: A-level post-2010 A*–E.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% A*–A · bounds/estimates not eligible

Reported value: 83.5. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: A-level subject entries. Recorded total for this measure: 346. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: A-level post-2010 A*–E.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% A*–B · bounds/estimates not eligible

Reported value: 97.1. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: A-level subject entries. Recorded total for this measure: 346. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: A-level post-2010 A*–E.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

Research context, reference history and record codes

The arithmetic removes Pre-U awards from a combined table; it does not convert Pre-U into A-level grades.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: research:spgs:2017:six-school-audit:pure-from-school-subjects. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
research:spgs:2017:six-school-audit:pure-from-school-subjects

Result period: 2017. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗