Latymer Upper · exam results

Latymer Upper: GCSE and IGCSE, 2000

Subject by subject, as the school or the government tables printed them. Each row links to its record and source.

2 records in 1 table.

GCSE / equivalents (DfE accountability) · subject results

DfE source-defined pupil or student population

Latymer Upper · GCSE / equivalents (DfE accountability) · subject results, 2000
SubjectDfE pupil achievement fraction · 0–1 scale and source-defined threshold
% of 15 year old pupils achieving 5 or more grades A*-C (GCSE/GNVQ) - 200011
% of 15 year old pupils achieving no passes (GCSE/GNVQ) - 200020
Notes on this table (2)

Every row: What it counts: DfE source-defined pupil or student population Where it’s from: Original publication

  1. Worth knowing: Original DfE accountability publication for 2003; source measure: % of 15 year old pupils achieving 5 or more grades A*-C (GCSE/GNVQ) - 2000. Source field: % of 15 year old pupils achieving 5 or more grades A*-C (GCSE/GNVQ) - 2000. Source value: 1. This is a pupil achievement fraction (0 to 1), not the share of subject entries at any grade. Recognised qualifications and source-defined pupil populations may omit qualifications in the school’s own results. No pure A-level or GCSE grade distribution, qualification denominator or causal school-quality conclusion inferred. This is a retrospective 2000 value printed in the 2003 publication; retain it separately from other source versions.
  2. Worth knowing: Original DfE accountability publication for 2003; source measure: % of 15 year old pupils achieving no passes (GCSE/GNVQ) - 2000. Source field: % of 15 year old pupils achieving no passes (GCSE/GNVQ) - 2000. Source value: 0. This is a pupil achievement fraction (0 to 1), not the share of subject entries at any grade. Recognised qualifications and source-defined pupil populations may omit qualifications in the school’s own results. No pure A-level or GCSE grade distribution, qualification denominator or causal school-quality conclusion inferred. This is a retrospective 2000 value printed in the 2003 publication; retain it separately from other source versions.
Source evidenceOpen full record ↗