Latymer Upper: Oxford and Cambridge

Every row: What it counts: Leavers taking up destinations How the source defines it: places

1. Also printed: Cambridge 12 · Oxford 11. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: 2026 leavers (results day) · medicine figure is offers received by medicine applicants (wording '12 received offers'); rate pct is first-choice course success among university applicants.
2. Also printed: Cambridge 13 · Oxford 22 · to Russell Group universities (as published) 89%. The publication also reports another figure. Check it counts the same outcome and group before you use either. Published sources differ. Read the source notes before using these figures. Where it’s from: also published: Oxbridge 35 (trustees' report 2026); first choice place pct 85 (trustees' report 2026) — the value shown controls Worth knowing: 2025 leavers (results day) · Cambridge not stated separately on results day (32 minus 22 is not recorded as a Cambridge figure). Good Schools Guide states 'Thirteen medics in 2025'. September destinations table shows Oxford 21, Cambridge 13 (see destination lists). · 2025 admissions incl. 5 Class of 2024 post-A-level applicants admitted to Oxford · Trustees' annual report; 35 = 22 Oxford (17 + 5 from previous year) + 13 Cambridge. Results-day post said 32 (22 Oxford) and 84% first choice. Pupils: 1,269 at Latymer Upper, 174 at Latymer Prep (1,443 total); 275 bursary pupils (147 free places, 128 partial).
3. Also printed: Oxford 13. Published sources differ. Read the source notes before using these figures. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: 2024 leavers (results day) · The 26 is worded as 'Oxbridge offers in total' in a results-day (places-confirmed) context; the school's leavers' destinations page later says 'the vast majority of our students who applied to university secured their place (96% in 2024)'. September destinations table: Oxford 14, Cambridge 14.
4. Also printed: to Russell Group universities (as published) 83%. The publication also reports another figure. Check it counts the same outcome and group before you use either. Published sources differ. Read the source notes before using these figures. Where it’s from: also published: Oxbridge 21 (trustees' report 2024); first choice place pct 88 (trustees' report 2024) — the value shown controls Worth knowing: 2023 leavers (results day) · September destinations table: Oxford 11, Cambridge 10. · 2023 leavers (trustees' report, year ended 31 Aug 2023) · Infographic-style report; the 21 Oxbridge figure matches findmyschool's '21 places' (89 applications, 25 offers). Results-day post said 19 places and 89% first choice. Pupils 1,267 (Upper) + 174 (Prep); 253 bursary pupils (134 free places).
5. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: 2022 leavers (results day) · September destinations table: Oxford 7, Cambridge 12.
6. Also printed: to Russell Group universities (as published) 89%. The publication also reports another figure. Check it counts the same outcome and group before you use either. Where it’s from: also published: first choice place pct 87 (trustees' report 2022) — the value shown controls Worth knowing: 2021 leavers (results day) · medicine figure includes veterinary science. September destinations table: Oxford 6, Cambridge 14. · 2021 leavers (trustees' report, year ended 31 Aug 2021) · The report's infographic numbers for Oxbridge and Medicine/Dentistry/Veterinary Science could not be reliably paired with their labels in text extraction (two reads gave 21/30 and 3/16), so they are not recorded; results-day post gave 20 Oxbridge, 15 medicine & vet, 30 international. Pupils 1,260 (Upper) + 171 (Prep) = 1,431; 243 bursary pupils (128 free places, 115 partial).
7. Published sources differ. Read the source notes before using these figures. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: 2020 leavers (post-CAG revision, 3 Sept 2020) · medicine figure includes veterinary science. September destinations table: Oxford 14, Cambridge 14.
8. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: 2018 leavers (results day) · londonpreprep's 2018 A-level article paraphrases this as 22 students admitted to Oxford and Cambridge.
9. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: 2017 leavers (results day) · medicine figure includes veterinary medicine; US figure includes Canada.
10. Ranges and bounds such as “over 90%” are shown as printed, so they aren’t charted as exact figures. Where it’s from: An original publication and a second-hand source Worth knowing: 2015 leavers (results day)

Every row: Where it’s from: The university’s table of applications from each school

1. Applications: 54 Worth knowing: Document footnote (verbatim): "In this table, raw figures less than 5 are reported as 5, with the exception of zeros, which are reported as 0." A printed value of 5 therefore means a raw figure of 1-5 and is treated here as suppressed. · apply centre printed as “Latymer Upper School and Latymer Prep”
2. Applications: 32 Worth knowing: Document footnote (verbatim): "In this table, raw figures less than 5 are reported as 5, with the exception of zeros, which are reported as 0." A printed value of 5 therefore means a raw figure of 1-5 and is treated here as suppressed.
3. Applications: 40 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<3" in the table. No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<3" is taken at face value as fewer than 3.
4. Applications: 45 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<3" in the table. No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<3" is taken at face value as fewer than 3.
5. Applications: 42 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<3" in the table. No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<3" is taken at face value as fewer than 3.
6. Applications: 32 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<3" in the table. No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<3" is taken at face value as fewer than 3.
7. Applications: 31 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<3" in the table. No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<3" is taken at face value as fewer than 3.
8. Applications: 35 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<3" in the table. No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<3" is taken at face value as fewer than 3.
9. Applications: 33 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<3" in the table. No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<3" is taken at face value as fewer than 3.
10. Applications: 24 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<3" in the table. No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<3" is taken at face value as fewer than 3.
11. Applications: 34 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<3" in the table. No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<3" is taken at face value as fewer than 3.
12. Applications: 47 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<3" in the table. No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<3" is taken at face value as fewer than 3.
13. Applications: 27 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<3" in the table. No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<3" is taken at face value as fewer than 3.
14. Applications: 35 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<4" in the table (2009-2012 files). No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<4" is taken at face value as fewer than 4.
15. Applications: 28 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<4" in the table (2009-2012 files). No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<4" is taken at face value as fewer than 4.
16. Applications: 38 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<4" in the table (2009-2012 files). No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<4" is taken at face value as fewer than 4.
17. Applications: 29 Worth knowing: Small values are printed as "<4" in the table (2009-2012 files). No explanatory footnote text was located in the PDF by the fetch tool; "<4" is taken at face value as fewer than 4.

1. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: 2025 leavers · US universities as published: “over 50 offers (international, all countries)” How the source defines it: offers
2. Also printed: Medicine 6 · to Russell Group universities (as published) around 85%. It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Year 13 2024 (July 2024, before results) · medicine = 6 bursary-student medicine applicants holding offers (not whole cohort). · US universities as published: “over 30 accepted to international universities (Canada, Europe, US)” How the source defines it: offers
3. It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Where it’s from: Quoted second-hand Worth knowing: 2023 UCAS cycle per findmyschool ('one recent year'); year attribution inferred from the 28% match with the Spectator 2023 table · Aggregator; year not printed. Oxford 14 / Cambridge 11 offers. How the source defines it: applications
4. It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: for September 2023 entry (March 2023) · Bonas MacFarlane, citing The Spectator's 2023 Oxbridge table, gives Latymer Upper a 28% offer success rate for the 2023 cycle; findmyschool.uk states 'in one recent year, 89 applications produced 25 offers and 21 places' (year not stated; consistent with 2023: 25/89 = 28.1%). · US universities as published: “38 early acceptances (international, all countries)” How the source defines it: offers
5. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: 2022 leavers · US universities as published: “82 offers from 48 international universities in 8 countries” How the source defines it: offers
6. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: cumulative 2017-2020 leavers (US enrolments since 2017) · Multi-year cumulative figures (2017-2020), not a single cohort. How the source defines it: destinations
7. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: 2019 leavers (results day) · No Oxbridge or medicine count in the 2019 post. September destinations table: Cambridge 9, Oxford 7. How the source defines it: places
8. It’s unclear which group this figure counts, so it isn’t compared. Some figures here are measured differently from the comparison charts. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Year 13 2018 (May 2018) · US universities as published: “49 places offered by international institutions (US and Canada)” How the source defines it: offers

Every row: What it counts: Applications to Oxford from this school Where it’s from: Original university annual dashboard checked on 15 October 2026 Worth knowing: Annual cycle selected in the public university dashboard, then the named school row read visually. The dashboard cells shown in grey are withheld under disclosure control; they are not zeros and no hidden value is inferred. Applications are associated with the UCAS apply centre, not necessarily the school’s current leaver cohort. Offers and acceptances are separate outcomes, not university destinations. How the source defines it: Exact applications and offers from the same annual university source row; any offer rate is calculated from these inputs.

1. Applications: 38
2. Applications: 52

Every row: Where it’s from: Original publication

1. Worth knowing: Eighty-eight per cent of students secured their first-choice university. The publication does not specify an applicant-only denominator or a pupil count; do not assume all leavers applied.
2. Worth knowing: Explicit population: students who applied to university. Eighty-six per cent secured a first-choice place; neither applicant count nor all-leaver proportion is supplied.

1. Where it’s from: Quoted second-hand; its method is unclear