NLCS · exam results

NLCS: GCSE and IGCSE, 2002

Subject by subject, as the school or the government tables printed them. Each row links to its record and source.

12 records in 1 table.

GCSE/GNVQ/equivalent accountability outcomes · subject results

The publication doesn’t say what these percentages are of.

Notes on this table (11)
  1. Where it’s from: Unclear what this counts Worth knowing: % no pass 02. The original numeric cell is a source fraction on0–1 scale (1=100%); it has not been multiplied or relabelled as a0–100 percentage. Exact school identity checked by LA/ESTAB and location. Qualifications and population change across source years; these are pupil threshold/accountability measures, not GCSE grade shares or full school examination distributions. No missing value filled or suppressed count reconstructed. The original school-table headers are abbreviated and the accompanying Sheet1 metadata is incomplete/misaligned. Retrospective year is retained from the printed two-digit column suffix; the exact GCSE/GNVQ eligibility definition remains unresolved and must be checked before comparison.
  2. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: % of 15 year old pupils achieving 1 A*-G (GCSE/GNVQ) - 2002. The original numeric cell is a source fraction on0–1 scale (1=100%); it has not been multiplied or relabelled as a0–100 percentage. Exact school identity checked by LA/ESTAB and location. Qualifications and population change across source years; these are pupil threshold/accountability measures, not GCSE grade shares or full school examination distributions. No missing value filled or suppressed count reconstructed.
  3. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: % of 15 year old pupils achieving 5 or more grades A*-C (GCSE/GNVQ) - 2002. The original numeric cell is a source fraction on0–1 scale (1=100%); it has not been multiplied or relabelled as a0–100 percentage. Exact school identity checked by LA/ESTAB and location. Qualifications and population change across source years; these are pupil threshold/accountability measures, not GCSE grade shares or full school examination distributions. No missing value filled or suppressed count reconstructed.
  4. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: % of 15 year old pupils achieving Level 2 threshold (GCSE/GNVQ) - 2002. The original numeric cell is a source fraction on0–1 scale (1=100%); it has not been multiplied or relabelled as a0–100 percentage. Exact school identity checked by LA/ESTAB and location. Qualifications and population change across source years; these are pupil threshold/accountability measures, not GCSE grade shares or full school examination distributions. No missing value filled or suppressed count reconstructed. The current cohort is pupils ending KS4; earlier retrospective columns explicitly concern15-year-olds. These populations are not silently equated.
  5. Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: % of 15 year old pupils achieving no passes (GCSE/GNVQ) - 2002. The original numeric cell is a source fraction on0–1 scale (1=100%); it has not been multiplied or relabelled as a0–100 percentage. Exact school identity checked by LA/ESTAB and location. Qualifications and population change across source years; these are pupil threshold/accountability measures, not GCSE grade shares or full school examination distributions. No missing value filled or suppressed count reconstructed.
  6. Where it’s from: Unclear what this counts Worth knowing: %5AC. The original numeric cell is a source fraction on0–1 scale (1=100%); it has not been multiplied or relabelled as a0–100 percentage. Exact school identity checked by LA/ESTAB and location. Qualifications and population change across source years; these are pupil threshold/accountability measures, not GCSE grade shares or full school examination distributions. No missing value filled or suppressed count reconstructed. The original school-table headers are abbreviated and the accompanying Sheet1 metadata is incomplete/misaligned. Retrospective year is retained from the printed two-digit column suffix; the exact GCSE/GNVQ eligibility definition remains unresolved and must be checked before comparison.
  7. Where it’s from: Unclear what this counts Worth knowing: %5AC02. The original numeric cell is a source fraction on0–1 scale (1=100%); it has not been multiplied or relabelled as a0–100 percentage. Exact school identity checked by LA/ESTAB and location. Qualifications and population change across source years; these are pupil threshold/accountability measures, not GCSE grade shares or full school examination distributions. No missing value filled or suppressed count reconstructed. The original school-table headers are abbreviated and the accompanying Sheet1 metadata is incomplete/misaligned. Retrospective year is retained from the printed two-digit column suffix; the exact GCSE/GNVQ eligibility definition remains unresolved and must be checked before comparison.
  8. Where it’s from: Unclear what this counts Worth knowing: %5AG. The original numeric cell is a source fraction on0–1 scale (1=100%); it has not been multiplied or relabelled as a0–100 percentage. Exact school identity checked by LA/ESTAB and location. Qualifications and population change across source years; these are pupil threshold/accountability measures, not GCSE grade shares or full school examination distributions. No missing value filled or suppressed count reconstructed. The original school-table headers are abbreviated and the accompanying Sheet1 metadata is incomplete/misaligned. Retrospective year is retained from the printed two-digit column suffix; the exact GCSE/GNVQ eligibility definition remains unresolved and must be checked before comparison.
  9. Where it’s from: Unclear what this counts Worth knowing: %no passes. The original numeric cell is a source fraction on0–1 scale (1=100%); it has not been multiplied or relabelled as a0–100 percentage. Exact school identity checked by LA/ESTAB and location. Qualifications and population change across source years; these are pupil threshold/accountability measures, not GCSE grade shares or full school examination distributions. No missing value filled or suppressed count reconstructed. The original school-table headers are abbreviated and the accompanying Sheet1 metadata is incomplete/misaligned. Retrospective year is retained from the printed two-digit column suffix; the exact GCSE/GNVQ eligibility definition remains unresolved and must be checked before comparison.
  10. Also printed: Source-defined pupil or student population count 101. Where it’s from: Unclear what this counts Worth knowing: 15pups. Source-defined15-year-old or Year11/KS4 pupil count, not all school pupils or subject entries. Exact school identity checked by LA/ESTAB and location. Qualifications and population change across source years; these are pupil threshold/accountability measures, not GCSE grade shares or full school examination distributions. No missing value filled or suppressed count reconstructed. The original school-table headers are abbreviated and the accompanying Sheet1 metadata is incomplete/misaligned. Retrospective year is retained from the printed two-digit column suffix; the exact GCSE/GNVQ eligibility definition remains unresolved and must be checked before comparison.
  11. Also printed: Published points per student · source-defined tariff 60.7. Where it’s from: Unclear what this counts Worth knowing: APS capped. Published points per source-defined pupil on the applicable historical GCSE/equivalent tariff, not a grade percentage. Exact school identity checked by LA/ESTAB and location. Qualifications and population change across source years; these are pupil threshold/accountability measures, not GCSE grade shares or full school examination distributions. No missing value filled or suppressed count reconstructed. The original school-table headers are abbreviated and the accompanying Sheet1 metadata is incomplete/misaligned. Retrospective year is retained from the printed two-digit column suffix; the exact GCSE/GNVQ eligibility definition remains unresolved and must be checked before comparison.
Source evidenceOpen full record ↗