Questions · Eton · KCS Wimbledon · SPGS · St Paul’s · Westminster · Winchester · Wycombe Abbey
What should happen when publications disagree?
Four years of Eton’s A-level figures, 2022 to 2025, turn up every kind of difference we record, and only one of them is still a mystery.
Covers: Eton’s A-level tables and annual reports for 2022 to 2025: four ways two figures for one year can differ, and the one difference still unexplained, A*–A in 2022. An example of how to read a difference; it makes no claim that Eton’s results are disputed.
The answer
Two publications that give different figures for the same year look like a quarrel, but the disagreement touches only that one figure, and the rest of the record carries on. Often the documents settle it themselves, because the school signed a table again, or one figure counted a different group, or the same count was printed two ways. Only a difference that nothing explains stays out of the comparison it affects, and even then both publications stay in view. So for anyone holding two figures that won’t agree, the practical course is to find out what each one counted before believing either. How many of a school’s documents survive, meanwhile, says more about the archive than about the school.
On this page
Eton’s 2025 annual report and A-level table no longer count as a disagreement. The report’s A*–A is the table’s own figure; its A*–B is the table’s figure, printed there to two decimal places, cut short at one instead of rounded. That leaves A*–A in 2022 as the worked example and the one difference still unexplained.
This answer now works through what Eton’s own documents explain: a table the school re-signed (2024), figures that counted Pre-U entries too (2023) and two figures that agree at the published precision (2022 A*–B). Two differences remain unexplained, and those years stay out of the comparisons they affect.
The figures
These figures belong to the years and groups discussed in this article. Changing your shortlist leaves this example as it is.
2022 · A-level post-2010 A*–E
Eton · Examinations Office A*–A
83.6%
The signed results table’s figure; it differs from the annual report.
- What it counts
- A-level subject entries
- Total behind the figure
- 758
2022 · A level · annual-report version
Eton · annual-report A*–A
83.5%
The annual report’s figure. The documents do not explain why it differs.
- What it counts
- The group counted has not been confirmed
- Total behind the figure
- Unknown / not recorded
Eton’s tables: four ways two figures can differ
Eton publishes its A-level results twice, in a table signed by its Examinations Officer and in its annual report. The 2022 pair begin by agreeing, both printing 95.4% for A*–B, which we call “Consistent at the published precision”, a long way of saying they agree as far as either goes. For A*–A they part company, the table printing 83.6% and the report 83.5%, and neither says why. That earns “Sources differ”, the only label of the four that admits we don’t know, and we come back to it below.
In 2023 the trouble lay in our own labelling. The figure we once showed as Eton’s A-level A* share, 44.8%, counted Pre-U entries too, while Eton’s A-level table on its own gives 43.7%; under “Different groups counted” both stay, each labelled, and only the A-level one is compared. “Revised by the school” is the simplest of the four. In 2024 Eton re-signed its table after one grade was raised, so the A* share is 38.7% and the first table’s 38.6% is superseded, with nothing for anyone to adjudicate.
The 2025 pair were the oddest, and the most innocent. The annual report gives A*–A as 78.2%, the table’s 78.2% exactly. A*–B is where the decimal places come apart: the table prints it to two, which our record shows to one, as 95.1%, and the report simply stops after the first, where one would expect it to round. The count behind both is the same, so 2025 joins 2022’s A*–B under “Consistent at the published precision”.
The difference first, the story later
Which brings us back to 2022, where the table and the annual report print different A*–A percentages and neither says why. A re-mark, a rounding or a changed group would each make a tidy story, and the obvious versions of the last two have already failed: the table’s count gives its own figure whether rounded or cut, and adding the Pre-U entries gives a different figure again. Until there is evidence, none of them is the explanation. So that school, year and grade band stay out of the comparison they affect; both publications remain available, other bands can still be used where their evidence permits, and the record page sets out exactly what differs and what we checked.
Later, higher, repeated: none of them settles it
A later document may explain an earlier one, but its date alone can’t; nor should the larger figure win for being larger, a habit better left to league tables; and two publications that agree are less reassuring than they look if both copied the same original table. The questions that help are plainer. What did each document actually count, and does one revise the other or merely repeat it? The source link lets you follow that up, though it is no promise that every figure in the document has been checked.
Survival is not a grade
A long run of tables may mean only that a school’s documents survived, stayed accessible and found a researcher, and a short one nothing worse than gaps in our own collection, so the length of an archive, on its own, tells you little about the education on offer. Why a particular figure is missing matters as well. Sometimes we can’t open the old page; sometimes the page leaves the number out, or the publisher has withheld a small count. Each calls for a different explanation, and none of them means the result was zero.
A question the school can answer
Both publications are there to read, and another band may be clear of the difference. Anyone who asks the school does better to name the table, the year and the band, and to ask which entries were included or whether the figure was revised, since a vague question tends to get a general reply and a precise one gives somebody at the school something they can actually answer.
Try the comparison
Eton and Westminster: A-level grades at A or above, 2022
Share of published A-level entries awarded grade A or above. Reported as A*–A from 2010; earlier rows use the pre-A* grade-A threshold.
There are no shared years in which Eton and Westminster can be compared on this measure. Try another result or period; the missing-years section explains the gaps.
Nothing to chart for these years. “Years left out, and why” below says why.
Exact values, and years left out
| School and year | Figure | What it counts | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eton College 2022 | 83.6%A-level post-2010 A*–E · Grade awards | A-level subject entriesOut of 758 | Source and full figures: Eton College, 2022 |
| Eton College 2022 | 83.5%A-level post-2010 A*–E · Grade awards | The publication doesn’t say who this counts | Source and full figures: Eton College, 2022 |
| Eton College 2022 | Unknown / not recordedA-level post-2010 A*–E · Grade awards | The publication doesn’t say who this countsOut of 692 | Source and full figures: Eton College, 2022 |
| Eton College 2022 | 83.6%A-level post-2010 A*–E · Grade awards | The publication doesn’t say who this counts | Source and full figures: Eton College, 2022 |
| Westminster School 2022 | Unknown / not recordedA-level post-2010 A*–E · Grade awards | The publication doesn’t say who this countsOut of 353 | Source and full figures: Westminster School, 2022 |
| Eton College 2022 | Unknown / not recordedA-level post-2010 A*–E · Grade awards | A-level subject entriesOut of 758 | Source and full figures: Eton College, 2022 |
| Westminster School 2022 | 90.7%A-level post-2010 A*–E · Grade awards | The publication doesn’t say who this countsOut of 407 | Source and full figures: Westminster School, 2022 |
| Westminster School 2022 | 90.7%A-level post-2010 A*–E · Grade awards | The publication doesn’t say who this countsOut of 407 | Source and full figures: Westminster School, 2022 |
Record details
Each figure’s status as recorded, the precision it was printed to, and its record code.
- Eton College, 2022: Primary · 1 decimal place ·
fig:eton_alevel_primary_sheets:2 - Eton College, 2022: Source disagreement · versions retained · 0 decimal places ·
new:eton:2022:a-level-annual-report-version - Eton College, 2022: Primary · As published; not an exact number ·
new:eton:2022:dfe-ks5-institution-aggregated-results-13604 - Eton College, 2022: Primary · 0 decimal places ·
new:eton:2022:school-final-a-level-distribution - Westminster School, 2022: Primary · As published; not an exact number ·
new:westminster:2022:dfe-ks5-institution-aggregated-results-2911 - Eton College, 2022: Verified primary publication; printed percentages · As published; not an exact number ·
research:eton:2022:audit-current-2022-Final-Summer-A2 - Westminster School, 2022: Source-defined table; date / version and scope retained · 0 decimal places ·
research:westminster:2022:a-level-school-subject-counts - Westminster School, 2022: Source-defined table; date / version and scope retained · 0 decimal places ·
research:westminster:2022:isc-shared-a-level-isc-population
- Eton · 2022: source disagreement; research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; unknown population basis; missing value
- Westminster · 2022: research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; unknown population basis; missing value
Where these figures come from
Each record gives the full definition, the documents it came from and what we checked.
Eton College, A level 2022: 55.4% of 758 entries graded A*
The signed results table’s figure; it differs from the annual report.
Publications differ on A*–A. Checked against the original: A*, A*–B and pass.
Eton College, A level 2022: 83.5% of entries graded A*–A
The annual report’s figure. The documents do not explain why it differs.
Publications differ on A*–A.
- What caused the example’s disagreement is still unknown.
- A historical dossier that claims a completed audit doesn’t vouch for every current field, or for every reading of one.
About this answer
Written by The Schools Record from the sources identified above. The earlier research listed below helped us find the questions and passages to examine. Figures in the article come from the current record, so an older research document cannot substitute an earlier number.
- Figures Bible v15.3 · historical examination reconstruction · pages 13, 79–83
- Figures Bible v12.8 · consolidated reader edition · pages 21–24, 30–36
Reviewed for this edition on ; next review by . That review covers this reading of the cited evidence. It does not mean that every original historical publication has been checked again.
Read corrections and unresolved publication differencesWhere next
What would you like to understand next?
Eton’s research coverage
How do exclusions change a long-period answer?
Could the apparent conflict be a difference in who was counted?
Your shortlist and years stay with you. “Ask this next” changes your current question, not anything you’ve saved.