Oxford
2025 admissions round
- Applications
- 44
- Offers
- 22
- Acceptances
- 21
We have checked these counts against the originals
Each figure has its own record: Applications · Offers · Acceptances
City of London
City of London: university destinations
Latest Oxford and Cambridge figures: 2025 admissions round. Latest list of where leavers went: 2016 leavers. Last checked 15 Oct 2026
Oxford and Cambridge
Cambridge
2025 admissions round
- Applications
- 48
- Offers
- 13
- Acceptances
- 10
We have checked these counts against the originals
Each figure has its own record: Applications · Offers · Acceptances
These applications are counted through the school that submitted them. An offer, an acceptance and a place taken up describe different steps, so adding them together would count some pupils more than once.
Oxford and Cambridge combined
Calculated from each university’s counts for the same application cycle: offers ÷ applications. These are applications from the school, not the share of its pupils going to Oxbridge.
| Cycle | Applications | Offers | Offer rate | Inputs and sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 92 | 35 | 38.0% | Oxford and Cambridge records: City of London School, 2025 |
Each input is counted once. Where a university conceals a small count or the records disagree, the affected total and rate are left uncalculated. Rates are rounded to one decimal place.
Other named destinations
2016: up to three universities from the newest dated destination records, in alphabetical order. These are individual published figures; overlapping records aren’t added together.
Bath
1
Destinations (where leavers went) · 2016
Source and full figures: Bath, 2016See the original and what we checked
Bristol
9
Destinations (where leavers went) · 2016
Source and full figures: Bristol, 2016See the original and what we checked
Durham
8
Destinations (where leavers went) · 2016
Source and full figures: Durham, 2016See the original and what we checked
University destinations on City of London’s site checked 23 Sep 2026
Every university record, by year
Applying, receiving an offer, accepting it and taking up a place are different steps. Each has its own table so that you can follow what the school actually reported. The summary tables are on this page; each year’s named universities, courses and subjects have a page of their own.
Latest year
2026
For 2026 we have 1 record of where leavers went: 0 with figures, 1 naming a university without a figure. Each comes from its own publication and may describe a different group of leavers, so they are not added together.
1 university named for 2026 without a count. A university named without a count may mean one pupil or many.
Earlier years: 201620152014201320122011.
Offers, applications and expected destinations are in the tables below.
Cambridge applications, offers and acceptances by year
Read each row as one admissions round for applicants from City of London. The offer count, the number accepted or admitted and the number who eventually went are separate steps. Any row whose original we have not checked is labelled.
| Round | Applications | Offers | Accepted / admitted | Record and source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 48 | 13 | 10 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
16 more rounds, 2009 to 2024
| Round | Applications | Offers | Accepted / admitted | Record and source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41 | 19 | 15 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2023 | 47 | 15 | 12 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2022 | 58 | 17 | 16 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2021 | 59 | 19 | 13 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2020 | 47 | 14 | 13 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2019 | 41 | 22 | 18 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2018 | 50 | 18 | 17 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2017 | 48 | 28 | 20 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2016 | 22 | 11 | 11 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2015 | 27 | 17 | 16 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2014 | 22 | 11 | 11 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2013 | 22 | 6 | 5 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2012 | 28 | 14 | 13 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2011 | 30 | 10 | 10 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2010 | 25 | 16 | 15 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
| 2009 | 28 | 10 | 10 | Records: Applications · Offers · AcceptancesChecked against the original ↗ |
What the records cover, by year
What schools reported, year by year, 1993–2026. Applications: 2006–2025; Offers: 1999–2001, 2003, 2006–2025; Accepted: 2006–2026; Where leavers went: 2011–2016, 2026; Other university records: 1993, 1998, 2002, 2010–2016, 2019, 2021–2025.
A filled square means we have found at least one figure of that kind for the year. It shows which information is available; it does not describe how well leavers did.
16 records in 9 summary tables.
We don’t add tables together: publications can overlap. A university named without a count may mean one pupil or many. A dash means no figure.
Nothing in the summary tables matches. Try “All recorded years”, or open a year below for its named universities and courses.
The summary tables (16 records in 9 tables)
Oxford entry cycle · summary
Applications to Oxford from this school · apply_centre_outcomes
| Year | Accepted / admitted outcomes | Applications | Offers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20251 | 21 | 44 | 22 |
| 20242 | 11 | 45 | 12 |
Notes on this table (2)
Every row: What it counts: Applications to Oxford from this school Where it’s from: Original university annual dashboard checked on 15 October 2026 Worth knowing: Annual cycle selected in the public university dashboard, then the named school row read visually. The dashboard cells shown in grey are withheld under disclosure control; they are not zeros and no hidden value is inferred. Applications are associated with the UCAS apply centre, not necessarily the school’s current leaver cohort. Offers and acceptances are separate outcomes, not university destinations. How the source defines it: Exact applications and offers from the same annual university source row; any offer rate is calculated from these inputs. Oxford apply-centre applications
- Applications: 44
- Applications: 45
University outcomes · summary
The publication doesn’t say what these percentages are of. · University destinations
| Year |
|---|
| 20151 | No figure for these columns in this record |
| 20112 | No figure for these columns in this record |
Notes on this table (2)
Every row: Where it’s from: Original publication
- Worth knowing: Explicit lower bound; no institution allocation. Published wording: at least 9 pupils. Kept as a bound/approximation, not converted to an exact percentage. How the source defines it: PDF page 8, Medical-school places
- Worth knowing: Denominator: boys heading to university. Mixed, undefined destination grouping; not a Russell Group-only rate. Published wording: more than 8 out of 10. Kept as a bound/approximation, not converted to an exact percentage. How the source defines it: PDF page 6, Russell Group and other “Premier League” colleges
University outcomes · summary
The publication doesn’t say what these percentages are of. · placement summary
| Year | Leavers in stated cohort | Leavers reported with no application | Reported UCAS placements | Reported total placements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 133 | 9 | 105 | 109 |
| 2014 | 146 | 15 | 113 | 114 |
| 2012 | 139 | 12 | 112 | 113 |
| 2011 | 130 | 11 | 100 | 103 |
| 2010 | 136 | 18 | 96 | 96 |
Notes on this table
Every row: Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Counts are source-stated categories; do not force them into an exhaustive partition. 2012 notes one non-applicant subsequently entered through Clearing. 2015 first heading calls 124 a cohort, whereas the text says 124 applicants from 133 boys; both wording and differing population are documented. How the source defines it: Published original school table or annual result passage.
University outcomes · summary
leavers · places secured
Notes on this table (1)
- What it counts: leavers Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Denominator is leavers as printed; application, offer and enrolment totals not provided. How the source defines it: PDF page 6, Leavers securing first- or second-choice university places
University outcomes · summary
pupils · destinations
Notes on this table (1)
- What it counts: pupils Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Subject grouping, not institution-specific destinations. How the source defines it: PDF page 6, Boys going on to science, engineering or maths
University destinations · summary
The publication doesn’t say what these percentages are of. · offer conditions achieved
| Year | Measure or group | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 1999 | Published school results passage in the original archive publication. | 20 |
| 1999 | Published school results passage in the original archive publication. | 9 |
Notes on this table
Every row: Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Pupils reported to have achieved their A-level offers. This is not an institution-level final destination list; medical-school and university groups may overlap. How the source defines it: Published school results passage in the original archive publication.
University destinations · summary
The publication doesn’t say what these percentages are of. · places, stage unresolved
| Year | Measure or group | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 19981 | Published school results passage in the original archive publication. | 18 |
Notes on this table (1)
- Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Source says eighteen places earned at Oxbridge; offer/acceptance stage is not explicitly defined. How the source defines it: Published school results passage in the original archive publication.
University destinations · summary
The publication doesn’t say what these percentages are of. · reported entry
| Year |
|---|
| 19931 | No figure for these columns in this record |
Notes on this table (1)
- Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: The source says twenty-something boys got into Oxford and Cambridge. This approximate phrase is retained without an invented exact count or split. How the source defines it: Published school results passage in the original archive publication.
Historical five-year Oxbridge hit rate · summary
The publication doesn’t say what these percentages are of. · Historical five-year Oxbridge hit rate · secondary table
| Year | Five Year Admissions | Five Year Hit Rate | Period Note | Publication Date | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-091 | 103 | 16.6% | Five-year period is not stated in the two-page excerpt; do not infer or mix with current data. | 2007-09 | 34 |
Notes on this table (1)
- Where it’s from: Quoted second-hand; its method is unclear
Named universities and courses, year by year
Each year has its own page, with every university, course and subject the publications name for it and the source of each.
No page for 2004–2005: no named universities or courses.
What does another school publish?
Schools do not all publish the same information. This view helps you see which years and stages each covers before trying to compare their outcomes.
Open either school’s tables to read the actual figures and follow them back to their sources.
Tell me when this is updated
We’ll email you when the figures on this page are updated, and use your address for nothing else. You can stop it at any time by replying. We keep your address for no longer than 12 months.
Ask by email The button opens an email to us in your own email app. Send it as it is.