City of London: named universities and courses, 2011

1. What it counts: UCAS apply-centre 11883; City of London School; 2011 Cambridge cycle applicants, not the school leaver cohort Where it’s from: Checked against the text of the university’s original PDF; the live web copy couldn’t be reopened at the time. Worth knowing: Original printed token: 10. Cells printed <4 are retained as fewer than 4; no midpoint or pupil allocation. Original PDF text layer and table headings checked. Direct public retrieval failed; held-file materialisation returned HTTP 502, so no fresh rendered-page visual check is claimed. How the source defines it: University-published acceptances by named apply centre and cycle. The table is not a destination register or an admissions probability.

1. What it counts: UCAS school 11883; City of London School; 2011 Oxford undergraduate cycle acceptances, not the school leaver cohort Where it’s from: Checked against the university’s Freedom of Information spreadsheet. The 2024 and 2025 admissions rounds haven’t yet been checked against an original. Worth knowing: Original printed token: 7. Most recent school name for the UCAS school ID is shown, not necessarily the name used in the source year (Guide row41). Identity checked by UCAS school ID, school name, country, postcode and independent-school group. How the source defines it: University-published acceptances by UCAS school and cycle from the FOI workbook. UCAS cycle named for entry in that year or deferred entry in the following year (Guide rows17–34). Undergraduate UCAS applications; Astrophoria Foundation Year and Graduate Entry Medicine excluded. Applications lacking UCAS school ID excluded (Guide rows37–42). Meeting offer conditions and firmly accepting a place to begin study; small numbers may not enrol because of late withdrawal or deferral. This is not an enrolment or school destination count (Guide row40). The table is not a destination register or an admissions probability.

1. What it counts: UCAS apply-centre 11883; City of London School; 2011 Cambridge cycle applicants, not the school leaver cohort Where it’s from: Checked against the text of the university’s original PDF; the live web copy couldn’t be reopened at the time. Worth knowing: Original printed token: 30. Cells printed <4 are retained as fewer than 4; no midpoint or pupil allocation. Original PDF text layer and table headings checked. Direct public retrieval failed; held-file materialisation returned HTTP 502, so no fresh rendered-page visual check is claimed. How the source defines it: University-published applications by named apply centre and cycle. The table is not a destination register or an admissions probability.

1. What it counts: UCAS school 11883; City of London School; 2011 Oxford undergraduate cycle applications, not the school leaver cohort Where it’s from: Checked against the university’s Freedom of Information spreadsheet. The 2024 and 2025 admissions rounds haven’t yet been checked against an original. Worth knowing: Original printed token: 32. Most recent school name for the UCAS school ID is shown, not necessarily the name used in the source year (Guide row41). Identity checked by UCAS school ID, school name, country, postcode and independent-school group. How the source defines it: University-published applications by UCAS school and cycle from the FOI workbook. UCAS cycle named for entry in that year or deferred entry in the following year (Guide rows17–34). Undergraduate UCAS applications; Astrophoria Foundation Year and Graduate Entry Medicine excluded. Applications lacking UCAS school ID excluded (Guide rows37–42). The table is not a destination register or an admissions probability.

Every row: Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Source count and rounded percentage retained. Do not infer a denominator or silently repair any mismatch. How the source defines it: School-published destinations observation.

Every row: Where it’s from: Original publication How the source defines it: Original school-published outcome type and count where expressly stated.

1. Worth knowing: No inferred admission probability or pupil denominator. Offers, interviews and applications remain distinct from final destinations; combined totals and university-specific rows must not be summed.
2. Worth knowing: University appears in named offer list. No exact university total is printed, so no count is derived from pupil names. No inferred admission probability or pupil denominator. Offers, interviews and applications remain distinct from final destinations; combined totals and university-specific rows must not be summed.

1. What it counts: UCAS apply-centre 11883; City of London School; 2011 Cambridge cycle applicants, not the school leaver cohort Where it’s from: Checked against the text of the university’s original PDF; the live web copy couldn’t be reopened at the time. Worth knowing: Original printed token: 10. Cells printed <4 are retained as fewer than 4; no midpoint or pupil allocation. Original PDF text layer and table headings checked. Direct public retrieval failed; held-file materialisation returned HTTP 502, so no fresh rendered-page visual check is claimed. How the source defines it: University-published offers by named apply centre and cycle. The table is not a destination register or an admissions probability.

1. What it counts: UCAS school 11883; City of London School; 2011 Oxford undergraduate cycle offers, not the school leaver cohort Where it’s from: Checked against the university’s Freedom of Information spreadsheet. The 2024 and 2025 admissions rounds haven’t yet been checked against an original. Worth knowing: Original printed token: 7. Most recent school name for the UCAS school ID is shown, not necessarily the name used in the source year (Guide row41). Identity checked by UCAS school ID, school name, country, postcode and independent-school group. How the source defines it: University-published offers by UCAS school and cycle from the FOI workbook. UCAS cycle named for entry in that year or deferred entry in the following year (Guide rows17–34). Undergraduate UCAS applications; Astrophoria Foundation Year and Graduate Entry Medicine excluded. Applications lacking UCAS school ID excluded (Guide rows37–42). The table is not a destination register or an admissions probability.

1. What it counts: pupils Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Seventeen boys described as going to the two universities. Combined total cannot be allocated to either institution. How the source defines it: PDF page 6, Oxford and Cambridge · destinations

Every row: Where it’s from: Original publication Worth knowing: Published leaver report, with offers and places separately labelled. Institution naming is retained from the source era. This observation is evidence retrieval, not an admission probability; do not sum duplicate summaries. How the source defines it: Published original school table or annual result passage.

Every row: Where it’s from: Original publication How the source defines it: Published original school table or annual result passage.

1. Worth knowing: Published leaver report, with offers and places separately labelled. Institution naming is retained from the source era. This observation is evidence retrieval, not an admission probability; do not sum duplicate summaries.
2. Worth knowing: London-institution summary; no unlisted university assumed absent. 2011 text uses inconsistent denominators (98, 99 and 100) elsewhere; no rate calculated. 2015 London summary is distinct from the all-applicant institution table and may have a different population. Institution naming is retained from the source era. This observation is evidence retrieval, not an admission probability; do not sum duplicate summaries.