Back to comparison

Wycombe Abbey · 2014

Wycombe Abbey GCSE results — archived publication c9a3a4 · 2014 · GCSE/IGCSE

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Publications conflict for at least one field. A check of another field does not resolve that disagreement.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

GCSE grades, counts and percentages as printed in this publication; original entry scope retained.

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

% A* · %
88.44
% A*–A · %
98.66
% A*–B · %
99.9
% A*–C · %
100.0
Published basis
GCSE grades, counts and percentages as printed in this publication; original entry scope retained.
Qualification
GCSE/IGCSE
Note
Counts and published percentages are independently transcribed; no lower grades or candidate total inferred. Differences between publications are retained, with no assumed re-mark or correction. The URL contains 2013, but the table explicitly labels the supported year; no year is inferred from the URL.
Publication status
Source disagreement · versions retained
Year
2014
Publication note

Source disagreement · versions retained

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Published sources differ. Read the source notes before using these figures.

This record has a different scope from the school-wide comparison series.

Where was this published?

Can I compare this figure?

% A* · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; source disagreement

Reported value: 88.44. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Legacy grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE A*–G.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% A*–A · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; source disagreement

Reported value: 98.66. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Legacy grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE A*–G.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% A*–B · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; source disagreement

Reported value: 99.9. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Legacy grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE A*–G.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

Research context, reference history and record codes

Counts and published percentages are independently transcribed; no lower grades or candidate total inferred. Differences between publications are retained, with no assumed re-mark or correction. The URL contains 2013, but the table explicitly labels the supported year; no year is inferred from the URL.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: research:wycombe:2014:gcse-igcse:archive-20160828212831:table-0:summary. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
research:wycombe:2014:gcse-igcse:archive-20160828212831:table-0:summary

Result period: 2014. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗