Latymer Upper School · 2005
GCSE / equivalents (DfE accountability) · published record · 2005 · GCSE / equivalents (DfE accountability)
Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.
Original-publication checks are recorded for 1 field. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.
Report a problem with this figure
Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.
Original DfE accountability publication for 2005; source measure: % of pupils achieving any qualifications. Source field: % of pupils achieving any qualifications. Source value: 1. This is a pupil achievement fraction (0 to 1), not the share of subject entries at any grade. Recognised qualifications and source-defined pupil populations may omit qualifications in the school’s own results. No pure A-level or GCSE grade distribution, qualification denominator or causal school-quality conclusion inferred.
Type of result: Examination results.
The reported values
Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.
- Published basis
- Original DfE accountability publication for 2005; source measure: % of pupils achieving any qualifications. Source field: % of pupils achieving any qualifications. Source value: 1. This is a pupil achievement fraction (0 to 1), not the share of subject entries at any grade. Recognised qualifications and source-defined pupil populations may omit qualifications in the school’s own results. No pure A-level or GCSE grade distribution, qualification denominator or causal school-quality conclusion inferred.
- DfE pupil achievement fraction · 0–1 scale and source-defined threshold
- 1
- Qualification
- GCSE / equivalents (DfE accountability)
- Note
- Original DfE accountability publication for 2005; source measure: % of pupils achieving any qualifications. Source field: % of pupils achieving any qualifications. Source value: 1. This is a pupil achievement fraction (0 to 1), not the share of subject entries at any grade. Recognised qualifications and source-defined pupil populations may omit qualifications in the school’s own results. No pure A-level or GCSE grade distribution, qualification denominator or causal school-quality conclusion inferred.
- Population basis
- DfE source-defined pupil or student population
- Subject
- % of pupils achieving any qualifications
- Year
- 2005
Publication note
Primary
Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record
Where was this published?
Checked against the original publication
DfE pupil achievement fraction · 0–1 scale and source-defined threshold · 2005. Value: 1.
DfE 2005 accountability data: historical KS4 outcomes · 2004-2005/england_ks4.xls, worksheet Mainstream, Excel/CSV row 61, column 37: % of pupils achieving any qualifications
Checked 2026-09-06.
Research context, reference history and record codes
Original DfE accountability publication for 2005; source measure: % of pupils achieving any qualifications. Source field: % of pupils achieving any qualifications. Source value: 1. This is a pupil achievement fraction (0 to 1), not the share of subject entries at any grade. Recognised qualifications and source-defined pupil populations may omit qualifications in the school’s own results. No pure A-level or GCSE grade distribution, qualification denominator or causal school-quality conclusion inferred.
These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.
DFE_2005_KS4_HISTORICAL· DfE 2005 accountability data: historical KS4 outcomes
Original record identifier: research:latymer-upper:2005:dfe:2005:ks4:field-37. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.
- Evidence
- P
- Record Id
- research:latymer-upper:2005:dfe:2005:ks4:field-37
Result period: 2005. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.