King’s College School, Wimbledon · 2020
A-level · published record · 2020 · A-level
Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.
Original-publication checks are recorded for 2 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.
Report a problem with this figure
Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.
2020 A-level subject grades, following the higher of centre-assessed and calculated grades.
Type of result: Examination results.
The reported values
Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.
- % A* · %
- 58.8
- % A*–A · %
- 90.1
- Published basis
- 2020 A-level subject grades, following the higher of centre-assessed and calculated grades.
- Qualification
- A-level
- Note
- The school states that one A-level centre-assessed grade was uplifted by the algorithm. The following combined A-level/IB figures are separate and are not used as pure A-level results. Pandemic awards, not ordinary examinations.
- Publication status
- Centre-assessed/calculated grades · 2020
- Year
- 2020
Publication note
Centre-assessed / calculated grades · 2020
Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record
These grades were awarded during the 2020–2021 exam cancellations and are kept separate from exam-year comparisons.
The record does not establish which group this figure counts.
This record has a different scope from the school-wide comparison series.
Where was this published?
Checked against the original publication
% A* · 2020.
The Corporation of King’s College School: report and financial statements for the year ended 31 July 2020 · PDF pages 16–17; printed pages 14–15, Academic performance
Checked 2026-09-06.
Checked against the original publication
% A*–A · 2020.
The Corporation of King’s College School: report and financial statements for the year ended 31 July 2020 · PDF pages 16–17; printed pages 14–15, Academic performance
Checked 2026-09-06.
Can I compare this figure?
% A* · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; unknown population basis; assessment-regime exclusion
Reported value: 58.8. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.
Group counted: Unknown. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: A-level post-2010 A*–E.
A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.
Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.
% A*–A · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; unknown population basis; assessment-regime exclusion
Reported value: 90.1. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.
Group counted: Unknown. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: A-level post-2010 A*–E.
A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.
Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.
Research context, reference history and record codes
The school states that one A-level centre-assessed grade was uplifted by the algorithm. The following combined A-level/IB figures are separate and are not used as pure A-level results. Pandemic awards, not ordinary examinations.
These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.
REV_B50C5C42FE05· The Corporation of King’s College School: report and financial statements for the year ended 31 July 2020
Original record identifier: research:kcs:2020:filed-report:a-level. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.
- Evidence
- P
- Record Id
- research:kcs:2020:filed-report:a-level
Result period: 2020. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.