Back to comparison

King’s College School, Wimbledon · 2009

GCSE/IGCSE 2009 · recovered source publication · 2009 · GCSE/IGCSE · A*–G

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Source references or checks are recorded, but verification of this particular figure against the original is incomplete.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

School Upper Fifth cohort, full GCSE/IGCSE courses only. Excludes short courses and Additional Mathematics; 2008–09 AS Latin is also excluded.

Type of result: Examination grade distribution.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

A count
419
% A* · %
66.7
% A*–A · %
94.1
% A*–B · %
99.3
% A*–C · %
99.9
A* count
1022
% A*–D · %
99.9
% A*–E · %
100.0
B count
80
Published basis
School Upper Fifth cohort, full GCSE/IGCSE courses only. Excludes short courses and Additional Mathematics; 2008–09 AS Latin is also excluded.
C count
10
Candidates
150
D count
0
E count
1
Entries
1532
Qualification
GCSE/IGCSE
Note
Percentages calculated from the exact original table counts to one decimal place. Date-specific initial source differs from later retrospective version; no replacement of that later version.
Outcome type
Examination grade distribution
Population basis
School Upper Fifth cohort, full GCSE/IGCSE courses only. Excludes short courses and Additional Mathematics; 2008–09 AS Latin is also excluded.
Publication status
archived source; source population and version retained
Grade scale
A*–G
U count
0
Year
2009
Publication note

archived source; source population and version retained

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

This record has a different scope from the school-wide comparison series.

Where was this published?

Can I compare this figure?

% A* · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 66.7. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Legacy grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: 1532. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE A*–G.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% A*–A · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 94.1. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Legacy grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: 1532. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE A*–G.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% A*–B · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 99.3. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Legacy grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: 1532. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE A*–G.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

Research context, reference history and record codes

Percentages calculated from the exact original table counts to one decimal place. Date-specific initial source differs from later retrospective version; no replacement of that later version.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: research:kcs:2009:gap-audit:school-original-gcse2009. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
research:kcs:2009:gap-audit:school-original-gcse2009

Result period: 2009. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗