King’s College School, Wimbledon · 1994

GCSE 1994 · The Times league table · 1994 · GCSE · A*–G

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Source references or checks are recorded, but verification of this particular figure against the original is incomplete.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

GCSE grade-entry percentages as reported to The Times; complete IGCSE inclusion unverified. Pupil counts are separate from grade-entry denominators.

Type of result: Examination grade distribution.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

% A* · %: 22.9
% A*–A · %: 68.1
Published basis: GCSE grade-entry percentages as reported to The Times; complete IGCSE inclusion unverified. Pupil counts are separate from grade-entry denominators.
Candidates: 122
Qualification: GCSE
Note: Original PDF page and crop visually checked; percentages are grade-entry shares, pupils are a separate denominator. GCSE label does not establish comprehensive IGCSE coverage.
Outcome type: Examination grade distribution
Population basis: GCSE grade-entry percentages as reported to The Times; complete IGCSE inclusion unverified. Pupil counts are separate from grade-entry denominators.
Publication status: Contemporary newspaper grade shares verified; original population and source versions retained
Grade scale: A*–G
Year: 1994

Publication note

Contemporary newspaper grade shares verified; original population and source versions retained

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

This record has a different scope from the school-wide comparison series.

Where was this published?

Checked against the original publication

* · 1994.

The Times GCSE results, 1994-09-03 · Printed page 9; PDF page 9; school row and column headings

Checked 2026-09-09. Source excerpt: No of pupils | % A* grades | % of all grades A–A*; {"school_id": "kcs", "school": "King’s College School, Wimbledon", "candidates": 122, "a_star": 22.9, "a_star_a": 68.1}

Can I compare this figure?

% A* · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 22.9. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Legacy grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE A*–G.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% A*–A · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 68.1. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Legacy grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE A*–G.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

Research context, reference history and record codes

Original PDF page and crop visually checked; percentages are grade-entry shares, pupils are a separate denominator. GCSE label does not establish comprehensive IGCSE coverage.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

SIX_AUDIT_1BEC5B572C91AC14 · The Times GCSE results, 1994-09-03 · Exact publication checked for the named qualification, year and source population

Original record identifier: research:kcs:1994:six-school-times-gcse. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence: P
Record Id: research:kcs:1994:six-school-times-gcse

Result period: 1994. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.