Back to comparison

Dulwich College · 2026

GCSE · published record · 2026 · GCSE · 9-1

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 17 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Combined full and short GCSE courses, 9-1 scale only

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
Combined full and short GCSE courses, 9-1 scale only
Entries weighted · weighted course entries, not pupils
2318
Grade 1 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
0
Grade 2 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
0
Grade 3 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
4
Grade 4 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
9
Grade 5 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
29
Grade 6 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
92
Grade 7 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
280
Grade 8 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
620
% grade 9 · %
55.39
% grades 9–4 · %
99.83
% grades 9–5 · %
99.44
% grades 9–6 · %
98.19
% grades 9–7 · %
94.22
% grades 9–8 · %
82.14
Grade 9 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
1284
Qualification
GCSE
Note
ISC published school return. Candidate populations are separate from subject entries; overlapping group totals are not added. A missing school return or an optional zero-filled qualification block does not establish non-provision. The other GCSE grading scale is a separate group. Candidate count spans both scales and is kept in a separate school-return population record. Fractional totals are retained as weighted full/short-course totals; pure full-course comparisons are excluded.
Population basis
Combined full and short GCSE courses, 9-1 scale only
Grade scale
9-1
U weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
0
Year
2026
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

This record has a different scope from the school-wide comparison series.

Where was this published?

17 publication checks are recorded for this figure. The 4 most recently accessed are shown; the rest are one disclosure away, not removed.

Checked against the original publication

Grade 9 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2026.

ISC 2026 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'BOYS AND GIRLS', cell DP54; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_9

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

Grade 8 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2026.

ISC 2026 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'BOYS AND GIRLS', cell DQ54; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_8

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

Grade 7 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2026.

ISC 2026 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'BOYS AND GIRLS', cell DR54; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_7

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

Grade 6 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2026.

ISC 2026 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'BOYS AND GIRLS', cell DS54; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_6

Checked 2026-09-06.

Read the other 13 publication checks

Checked against the original publication

Grade 5 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2026.

ISC 2026 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'BOYS AND GIRLS', cell DT54; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_5

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

Grade 4 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2026.

ISC 2026 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'BOYS AND GIRLS', cell DU54; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_4

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

Grade 3 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2026.

ISC 2026 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'BOYS AND GIRLS', cell DV54; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_3

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

Grade 2 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2026.

ISC 2026 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'BOYS AND GIRLS', cell DW54; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_2

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

Grade 1 weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2026.

ISC 2026 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'BOYS AND GIRLS', cell DX54; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_1

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

U weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2026.

ISC 2026 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'BOYS AND GIRLS', cell DY54; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_9To1_U

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

Entries weighted · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2026.

ISC 2026 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'BOYS AND GIRLS', cell DZ54; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_9To1_Entries

Checked 2026-09-06.

Can I compare this figure?

% grade 9 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 55.39. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Numbered grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE 9–1.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% grades 9–8 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 82.14. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Numbered grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE 9–1.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% grades 9–7 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 94.22. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Numbered grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE 9–1.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

Research context, reference history and record codes

ISC published school return. Candidate populations are separate from subject entries; overlapping group totals are not added. A missing school return or an optional zero-filled qualification block does not establish non-provision. The other GCSE grading scale is a separate group. Candidate count spans both scales and is kept in a separate school-return population record. Fractional totals are retained as weighted full/short-course totals; pure full-course comparisons are excluded.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:dulwich:2026:gcse-full-short-numbered:isc-return. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
new:dulwich:2026:gcse-full-short-numbered:isc-return

Result period: 2026. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗