The Schools RecordHome
Menu
Back to comparison
Check a figure / Published record

Brighton College · 2019

GCSE · published record · 2019 · GCSE · 9-1

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Publications conflict for at least one field. A check of another field does not resolve that disagreement.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Published rounded 2019 GCSE summary

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
Published rounded 2019 GCSE summary
Subject entries · approximate
2000
Failed papers count
0
% grade 9 · %
49
% grades 9–7 · %
94
% grades 9–8 · %
80
Qualification
GCSE
Note
The annual prints 900 grade 9s as a headline, while a later recruitment pack says over 900; the count precision is unresolved. Separate publications give 93.93% at 9–7/A*–A and 94.49% at 9–7. Scope and revisions remain unresolved.
Publication status
Source disagreement · versions retained
Pupils seven or more grade 9 count
54
Grade scale
9-1
Year
2019
Publication note

Source disagreement · versions retained

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Published sources differ. Read the source notes before using these figures.

This record has a different scope from the school-wide comparison series.

Where was this published?

6 publication checks are recorded for this figure. The 4 most recently accessed are shown; the rest are one disclosure away, not removed.

Read the other 2 publication checks

Can I compare this figure?

% grade 9 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; source disagreement

Reported value: 49. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Numbered grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE 9–1.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% grades 9–8 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; source disagreement

Reported value: 80. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Numbered grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE 9–1.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% grades 9–7 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; source disagreement

Reported value: 94. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Numbered grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE 9–1.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

Research context, reference history and record codes

The annual prints 900 grade 9s as a headline, while a later recruitment pack says over 900; the count precision is unresolved. Separate publications give 93.93% at 9–7/A*–A and 94.49% at 9–7. Scope and revisions remain unresolved.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:brighton:2019:gcse:brightonian2019. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
new:brighton:2019:gcse:brightonian2019

Result period: 2019. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗