Westminster · exam results

Westminster: GCSE and IGCSE, 2000

Subject by subject, as the school or the government tables printed them. Each row links to its record and source.

2 records in 1 table.

GCSE and equivalents (government accountability) · subject results

Source-defined KS4 or age15 pupil population; not examination entries

Westminster · GCSE and equivalents (government accountability) · subject results, 2000
SubjectDfE pupil achievement fraction · 0–1 scale and source-defined threshold
% of 15 year old pupils achieving 5 or more grades A*-C (GCSE/GNVQ) - 200010.96
% of 15 year old pupils achieving no passes (GCSE/GNVQ) - 200020.03
Notes on this table (2)

Every row: Qualification, as the source names it: Original government KS4 publication; qualification scope as stated. What it counts: Source-defined KS4 or age15 pupil population; not examination entries Where it’s from: Original publication

  1. Worth knowing: Original 2003 workbook field: % of 15 year old pupils achieving 5 or more grades A*-C (GCSE/GNVQ) - 2000. Excel number format 0% displays this fractional cell as a percentage:1 means100%. The stored fraction is retained exactly. Government-recognised GCSE/GNVQ or other equivalents and the stated age15/end-KS4 population are distinct from full school GCSE/IGCSE examination entries. A zero accountability threshold is not evidence that nobody passed a school examination. Retrospective publication versions remain separate; symbols are not zeros.
  2. Worth knowing: Original 2003 workbook field: % of 15 year old pupils achieving no passes (GCSE/GNVQ) - 2000. Excel number format 0% displays this fractional cell as a percentage:1 means100%. The stored fraction is retained exactly. Government-recognised GCSE/GNVQ or other equivalents and the stated age15/end-KS4 population are distinct from full school GCSE/IGCSE examination entries. A zero accountability threshold is not evidence that nobody passed a school examination. Retrospective publication versions remain separate; symbols are not zeros.
Source evidenceOpen full record ↗