Back to comparison

Wycombe Abbey · 1990

A-level 1990 · Financial Times school survey · 1990 · A-level · A–E

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Source references or checks are recorded, but verification of this particular figure against the original is incomplete.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

A-level entries as reported to the Financial Times; General Studies scope unverified

Type of result: Examination grade distribution.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
A-level entries as reported to the Financial Times; General Studies scope unverified
% A · %
44
Qualification
A-level
Note
Financial Times telephone survey of school heads. Ranking is a separate reputational ranking: table order is not an A-grade ranking. Percentages are shares of examination grades, not pupil rates. General Studies inclusion is discussed as varying between schools; no per-school count or harmonised exclusion is supplied. The article explicitly discusses A-level examinations sat in 1990, calls St Paul's 1990 an unusually good examination year and compares Winchester/Eton 1990 examination grades. A* did not exist at A-level in1990; no A* value is recorded.
Outcome type
Examination grade distribution
Population basis
A-level entries as reported to the Financial Times; General Studies scope unverified
Publication status
Contemporary newspaper grade percentage verified; General Studies scope unresolved
Grade scale
A–E
Year
1990
Publication note

Contemporary newspaper grade percentage verified; General Studies scope unresolved

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

The record does not establish which group this figure counts.

This record has a different scope from the school-wide comparison series.

Where was this published?

Can I compare this figure?

% A · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; unknown population basis

Reported value: 44. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Unknown. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: A-level pre-2010 A–E.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

Research context, reference history and record codes

Financial Times telephone survey of school heads. Ranking is a separate reputational ranking: table order is not an A-grade ranking. Percentages are shares of examination grades, not pupil rates. General Studies inclusion is discussed as varying between schools; no per-school count or harmonised exclusion is supplied. The article explicitly discusses A-level examinations sat in 1990, calls St Paul's 1990 an unusually good examination year and compares Winchester/Eton 1990 examination grades. A* did not exist at A-level in1990; no A* value is recorded.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: research:wycombe:1990:six-school-ft-a-level. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
research:wycombe:1990:six-school-ft-a-level

Result period: 1990. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗