Back to comparison

Westminster School · 2024

GCSE/IGCSE school-published population 2024 · recovered source publication · 2024 · GCSE · 9–1

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Source references or checks are recorded, but verification of this particular figure against the original is incomplete.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Source-reported percentage headline; source version and qualification scope retained

Type of result: Examination grade distribution.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
Source-reported percentage headline; source version and qualification scope retained
% grade 9 · %
79
% grades 9–7 · %
99
% grades 9–8 · %
95
Qualification
GCSE
Note
The detailed subject table is not arithmetically sound: Music has13entries but12grade9+2grade8=14grades; overall1336entries versus1337listedgrades. The headline therefore stays separate; lower bands are not derived. Earlier results-day headline77/94/just-under99 is a different version.128candidates.
Outcome type
Examination grade distribution
Population basis
Published school headline population
Publication status
Dated source headline
Grade scale
9–1
Qualification label in original publication
GCSE/IGCSE school-published population
Year
2024
Publication note

Dated source headline

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

This record has a different scope from the school-wide comparison series.

Where was this published?

Can I compare this figure?

% grade 9 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 79. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Numbered grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE 9–1.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% grades 9–8 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 95. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Numbered grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE 9–1.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% grades 9–7 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 99. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Numbered grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE 9–1.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

Research context, reference history and record codes

The detailed subject table is not arithmetically sound: Music has13entries but12grade9+2grade8=14grades; overall1336entries versus1337listedgrades. The headline therefore stays separate; lower bands are not derived. Earlier results-day headline77/94/just-under99 is a different version.128candidates.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: research:westminster:2024:gcse-school-headline-march-2025. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
research:westminster:2024:gcse-school-headline-march-2025

Result period: 2024. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗