Radley College, GCSE/IGCSE 2009: 86.9% of entries graded A*–A

86.9%
GCSE/IGCSE entries graded A*–A
GCSE/IGCSE entries (the total isn’t printed) · summer 2009 exams
Checked against the original
The Radleian 2010, Academic Report, Printed page 16 Open original: The Radleian 2010, Academic Report
Checked by TSR 6 Sep 2026
Cite
Radley College. GCSE/IGCSE entries graded A*–A: 86.9% (GCSE/IGCSE entries (the total isn’t printed)), summer 2009 exams. Status: Checked against the original. Source: The Radleian 2010, Academic Report, Printed page 16, https://radleyarchives.co.uk/view/6895-the-radleian-2010-018. Checked by The Schools Record on 6 September 2026. The Schools Record, https://theschoolsrecord.co.uk/evidence/research:radley:2009:radleian-49-18:retrospective-gcse/
Report a problem

Checked against the original: A*–A.

What it counts

Original academic report; Retrospective 2009 result printed in 2010. Retrospective 2009 figure differs from 85.93 in 2009 report; no averaging or preferred correction.

The figures

As printed.

A*–A: 86.9
Qualification: GCSE/IGCSE

Notes and original wording (4)

What it counts: Original academic report; Retrospective 2009 result printed in 2010. Retrospective 2009 figure differs from 85.93 in 2009 report; no averaging or preferred correction.
Note: Original academic report; Retrospective 2009 result printed in 2010. Retrospective 2009 figure differs from 85.93 in 2009 report; no averaging or preferred correction.
Who is counted: published grade entries, unless explicitly described as candidates
Year: 2009

This figure covers a different group from the school-wide series.

Where it was published

The Radleian 2010, Academic Report

Printed page 16, Academic Report · Checked 6 Sep 2026

Open the original

matches A*–A

Notes on this record

Where it’s from: Original publication
Worth knowing: Original academic report; Retrospective 2009 result printed in 2010. Retrospective 2009 figure differs from 85.93 in 2009 report; no averaging or preferred correction.

Can I compare it?

A*–A: left out of comparisons: covers a different group from the school-wide series; measured differently.

Record details

Record ID research:radley:2009:radleian-49-18:retrospective-gcse. Quote it if you report a problem.

As recorded

The record’s own wording, where this page puts it in plainer words.

Collection note: Original academic report; Retrospective 2009 result printed in 2010. Retrospective 2009 figure differs from 85.93 in 2009 report; no averaging or preferred correction.
Source note: Primary

Source references

REV_6491C2B80142 · The Radleian 2010, Academic Report

Codes and identifiers

Evidence: P
Record Id: research:radley:2009:radleian-49-18:retrospective-gcse

Comparison codes

grade_9 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; missing value · missing · As published; not an exact number · origin P
grade_9_8 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; missing value · missing · As published; not an exact number · origin P
grade_9_7 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; missing value · missing · As published; not an exact number · origin P
a_star · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; missing value · missing · As published; not an exact number · origin P
a_star_a · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions · exact · 0 decimal places · origin P
a_star_b · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; missing value · missing · As published; not an exact number · origin P

Check log

2026-09-06 · a_star_a · verified · The Radleian 2010, Academic Report · Printed page 16, Academic Report

All Radley College records like this · Report a problem with this figure (opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk, or write a fuller report)