Back to comparison

King’s College School, Wimbledon · 2008

A-level · published record · 2008 · A-level

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 1 field. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Separately named qualification; school-authored summary by David Grossel.

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

% A–B grades
88
Published basis
Separately named qualification; school-authored summary by David Grossel.
Qualification
A-level
Note
A-level paragraph explicitly describes the last group of A-level candidates. IB count is over120, not120. GCSE includes IGCSE Mathematics and Sciences. Grade rates are subject entries, IB points are pupil outcomes.
Publication status
school publication
Year
2008
Publication note

school publication

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

A-level paragraph explicitly describes the last group of A-level candidates. IB count is over120, not120. GCSE includes IGCSE Mathematics and Sciences. Grade rates are subject entries, IB points are pupil outcomes.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: research:kcs:2008:a-level:fc8bb2f48b. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
research:kcs:2008:a-level:fc8bb2f48b

Result period: 2008. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗