King’s College School, Wimbledon · 2005

IB · published record · 2005 · IB

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 1 field. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Separately named qualification; school-authored summary by David Grossel.

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis: Separately named qualification; school-authored summary by David Grossel.
Qualification: IB
Mean points: 40
Note: Mean IB diploma score out of45, separately named.
Publication status: preliminary; late changes still arriving
Year: 2005

Publication note

preliminary; late changes still arriving

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

This is an initial or provisional figure; later revisions may change it.

Where was this published?

Checked against the original publication

Mean points · 2005.

Old King’s Club Newsletter107, October2005 · PDFpage8, printedpage6, School Examination Results

Checked 2026-09-06.

Research context, reference history and record codes

Mean IB diploma score out of45, separately named.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

REV_AAE6D5ABCC31 · Old King’s Club Newsletter107, October2005

Original record identifier: research:kcs:2005:ib:aae6d5abcc. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence: P
Record Id: research:kcs:2005:ib:aae6d5abcc

Result period: 2005. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.