King’s College School, Wimbledon · 2002
A-level 2002 · recovered source publication · 2002 · A-level · A–E
Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.
Source references or checks are recorded, but verification of this particular figure against the original is incomplete.
Report a problem with this figure
Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.
School A-level results, separate from the AS table on page 2. Earlier years are retrospective rows in the 2004 publication.
Type of result: Examination grade distribution.
The reported values
Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.
- Published basis
- School A-level results, separate from the AS table on page 2. Earlier years are retrospective rows in the 2004 publication.
- % A · %
- 64.6
- % A–B · %
- 90.2
- % A–C · %
- 98.3
- % A–D · %
- 99.6
- % A–E · %
- 100
- Qualification
- A-level
- Note
- Source versions differ from alumni newsletter reports and may include result revisions or cohort coverage differences. Do not overwrite or combine denominators from those reports. A* not applicable before 2010.
- Outcome type
- Examination grade distribution
- Population basis
- School A-level results, separate from the AS table on page 2. Earlier years are retrospective rows in the 2004 publication.
- Publication status
- archived source; source population and version retained
- Grade scale
- A–E
- Year
- 2002
Publication note
archived source; source population and version retained
Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record
The record does not establish which group this figure counts.
This record has a different scope from the school-wide comparison series.
Where was this published?
Checked against the original publication
* · 2002.
King’s College School A-level results: archived school publication · PDF page 1, cumulative percentages table
Checked 2026-09-09. Source excerpt: 2002 | A / A–B / A–C / A–D / A–E | 64.6 / 90.2 / 98.3 / 99.6 / 100
Can I compare this figure?
% A · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; unknown population basis
Reported value: 64.6. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.
Group counted: Unknown. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: A-level pre-2010 A–E.
A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.
Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.
% A–B · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; unknown population basis
Reported value: 90.2. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.
Group counted: Unknown. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: A-level pre-2010 A–E.
A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.
Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.
Research context, reference history and record codes
Source versions differ from alumni newsletter reports and may include result revisions or cohort coverage differences. Do not overwrite or combine denominators from those reports. A* not applicable before 2010.
These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.
SIX_AUDIT_64A44C06A3BDA4E1· King’s College School A-level results: archived school publication · Exact publication checked for the named qualification, year and source population
Original record identifier: research:kcs:2002:gap-audit:school-2004-retrospective. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.
- Evidence
- P
- Record Id
- research:kcs:2002:gap-audit:school-2004-retrospective
Result period: 2002. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.