Back to comparison

St Mary’s School Ascot · 2009

GCSE · published record · 2009 · GCSE · A*-G

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 17 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Combined full and short GCSE courses, A*–G scale

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

% A* · %
53.57
% A*–A · %
85.07
% A*–B grades
97.01
% A*–C grades
99.67
A* weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
323
A weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
190
B weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
72
Published basis
Combined full and short GCSE courses, A*–G scale
C weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
16
Candidates
60
D weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
2
E weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
0
Entries weighted · weighted course entries, not pupils
603
F weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
0
G weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
0
Qualification
GCSE
Note
ISC published school return. Candidate populations are separate from subject entries; overlapping group totals are not added. A missing school return or an optional zero-filled qualification block does not establish non-provision. Fractional totals are retained as weighted full/short-course totals, not whole entries or pupils. Pure full-course comparisons are excluded.
Population basis
Combined full and short GCSE courses, A*–G scale
Pupils five or more A* c count
60
% Pupils five or more A* c
100
Grade scale
A*-G
U weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils
0
Year
2009
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

This record has a different scope from the school-wide comparison series.

Where was this published?

17 publication checks are recorded for this figure. The 4 most recently accessed are shown; the rest are one disclosure away, not removed.

Checked against the original publication

A* weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BG381; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_A_star

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

A weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BH381; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_A

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

B weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BI381; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_B

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

C weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BJ381; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_C

Checked 2026-09-06.

Read the other 13 publication checks

Checked against the original publication

D weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BK381; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_D

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

E weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BL381; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_E

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

F weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BM381; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_F

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

G weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BN381; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_G

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

U weighted total · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BO381; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_U

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

Entries weighted · weighted course entries, not pupils · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BP381; header Combined_Full_and_Short_Courses_Total_Entries

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

% A*–B grades · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BZ381; header Percentage_of_Entries_With_Results_at_B_or_Better_Total

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

% A*–C grades · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell CA381; header Percentage_of_Entries_With_Results_at_C_or_Better_Total

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

Pupils five or more A* c count · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BR381; header Total_Number_Gaining_5_or_More_Astar_to_C_Passes

Checked 2026-09-06.

Checked against the original publication

% Pupils five or more A* c · 2009.

ISC 2009 examination results: gcse, boys and girls · Worksheet 'GCSE & IGCSE Results 2009', cell BS381; header Percentage_of_Total_Gaining_5_or_More_Astar_to_C

Checked 2026-09-06.

Can I compare this figure?

% A* · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 53.57. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Legacy grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE A*–G.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% A*–A · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions

Reported value: 85.07. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Legacy grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE A*–G.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

Research context, reference history and record codes

ISC published school return. Candidate populations are separate from subject entries; overlapping group totals are not added. A missing school return or an optional zero-filled qualification block does not establish non-provision. Fractional totals are retained as weighted full/short-course totals, not whole entries or pupils. Pure full-course comparisons are excluded.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:st-marys-ascot:2009:gcse-full-short:isc-return. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
new:st-marys-ascot:2009:gcse-full-short:isc-return

Result period: 2009. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗