Back to comparison

Brighton College · 2016

GCSE · published record · 2016 · GCSE · A*-G

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 6 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Published GCSE letter-grade summary

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

% A* a · strictly greater than
90
A* count
1123
Published basis
Published GCSE letter-grade summary
Entries
2082
Failed papers count
0
Qualification
GCSE
Note
Published bounds remain bounds; pupil-achievement counts are not examination-entry denominators.
Publication status
Published
Pupils all A* a count
128
Pupils ten or more A* count
38
Grade scale
A*-G
Year
2016
Publication note

Published

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

6 publication checks are recorded for this figure. The 4 most recently accessed are shown; the rest are one disclosure away, not removed.

Read the other 2 publication checks
Research context, reference history and record codes

Published bounds remain bounds; pupil-achievement counts are not examination-entry denominators.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:brighton:2016:gcse:brightonian2016. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
new:brighton:2016:gcse:brightonian2016

Result period: 2016. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗