King’s College School, Wimbledon · 2018

A-level and IB published crosswalk · 2018

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Source references or checks are recorded, but verification of this particular figure against the original is incomplete.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

school-defined combined A-level + IB-HL equivalent; percentage and entry denominator use A-level subject entries plus IB Higher-Level entries only

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

% A* or IB HL 7 · %: 51.5
A-level entries: 379
A-level pathway pupils: 114
Actual A-level takers: 114
% A*–A or IB HL 7–6 · %: 84.6
% A*–B or IB HL 7–5 · %: 96.8
Candidates: 193
Entries: 618
IB candidates: 79
IB Higher-Level entries: 239
Year: 2018

Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

We have not recorded a check of the original publication for this particular figure. The references below may cover other results in the same collection.

Research context, reference history and record codes

Candidate counts are unique route cohorts; entry counts are A-level entries plus IB Higher-Level entries, not all six IB diploma subjects. Missing grade percentages and denominators are not inferred.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

FB13 · Publication title not recorded · public link not established · controlling full-table base
FB146 · Publication title not recorded · public link not established · latest seven-school companion and Wayback/destination lock
public-source-d33709b36604f2d2 · KCS Wimbledon · A-level and IB results · 2017–2025 chronological pack · public link not established · controlling school-result tables for modern A-level pathway counts, actual A-level takers, A-level entries, IB candidates, IB Higher-Level entries and the unique combined cohort
KCS_OKC_2003 · Old King's Club Newsletter 103 · Summer 2003 examination results · public link not established · primary contemporary KCS report: A-level, IB, combined Upper Sixth and GCSE candidate counts plus A-level/GCSE subject-exam totals
KCS_OKC_2004 · Old King's Club Newsletter 105 · Summer 2004 examination results · public link not established · primary contemporary KCS report: A-level, IB, combined Upper Sixth and GCSE candidate counts plus A-level/GCSE subject-exam totals
KCS_FT_2007 · Financial Times · Top 1,000 Schools · 8 March 2008 · public link not established · secondary league table for 2007 results: 44 A-level-only pupils, 111 IB candidates and 155 combined candidates
KCS_FT_2009 · Financial Times · Independent schools · 12 September 2009 · public link not established · secondary league table: 135 IB candidates and no A-level candidates
KCS_FT_2011 · Financial Times Schools Special · 10 September 2011 · public link not established · secondary league table: 145 IB candidates and 436 printed IB Higher-Level entries; the printed entry total is retained despite exceeding three per candidate by one
public-source-ac809a47570cbcf0 · KCS Wimbledon · legacy sixth-form cohort report · public link not established · secondary synthesis used only for explicitly labelled 2008 lower-bound, 2014, 2016 and 2017 cohort facts where the underlying primary file is not held

Original record identifier: fig:kcs_combined_alevel_ib:12. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence: P

Result period: 2018. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Research questions

An explanation using this record

All research questions →

Why a combined A-level and IB headline needs unpacking

The route counts and native examination results give a more specific answer than a combined A-level/IB headline.

Read the explanation and evidence