Godolphin and Latymer School · 2015

IB Diploma results · 2015 · IB Diploma · IB 1–7 · 45 points

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Source references or checks are recorded, but verification of this particular figure against the original is incomplete.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

IB Diploma cohort measures as printed (candidates, average points of passing candidates, share at 40+); kept apart from A level

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

IB candidates: 20
Qualification: IB Diploma
Mean points: 40
Note: IBO 'School Statistics - May 2015' sheet (school code 002194).
Published wording: Candidates registered: 20; Subject entries: 160; Candidates who passed diploma: 20; Average points (passing candidates): 40; Highest diploma points: 45; Average grade (passing candidates): 6.11
Grade scale: IB 1–7 · 45 points
Year: 2015

Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

We have not recorded a check of the original publication for this particular figure. The references below may cover other results in the same collection.

Research context, reference history and record codes

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

EXT_GODOLPHIN_LATYMER_4F6F9E3E · Godolphin and Latymer School / IBO · IB Results 2015 (IBO school statistics) · 2015 · public link not established · results PDF; IB Diploma 2015

Original record identifier: ext:godolphin_latymer_ib:0. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence: P

Result period: 2015. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.