Back to comparison

Wycombe Abbey · 2018

2018 accepted university places · 2018 · University outcomes

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 2 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

28 girls accepted Oxford/Cambridge places; grouped total is not allocated between institutions. US names have no counts.

Type of result: accepted places.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
28 girls accepted Oxford/Cambridge places; grouped total is not allocated between institutions. US names have no counts.
Qualification
University outcomes
Note
The source says accepted places; this is not an application or offer count.
Outcome type
accepted places
Oxford + Cambridge
28
Population basis
published school-leaver outcomes
US universities
Yale; University of Southern California; University of Pennsylvania
Year
2018
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

The source says accepted places; this is not an application or offer count.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: research:wycombe:2018:accepted-places:ui-source-pass. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
research:wycombe:2018:accepted-places:ui-source-pass

Result period: 2018. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗