Back to comparison

St Paul’s School · 2025

GCSE/IGCSE 2025 · St Paul’s School GCSE results · 2025 · GCSE/IGCSE · 9–1

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Source references or checks are recorded, but verification of this particular figure against the original is incomplete.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

School GCSE/IGCSE grade entries on the 9–1 scale

Type of result: Examination grade distribution.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
School GCSE/IGCSE grade entries on the 9–1 scale
% grades 9–6 · %
99.7
Qualification
GCSE/IGCSE
Note
Official current summary; retain the source version rather than replacing existing top-three values.
Outcome type
Examination grade distribution
Population basis
School GCSE/IGCSE grade entries on the 9–1 scale
Publication status
Source-specific grade percentages verified
Grade scale
9–1
Year
2025
Publication note

Source-specific grade percentages verified

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

Official current summary; retain the source version rather than replacing existing top-three values.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: research:st-pauls:2025:six-school-audit:gcse-igcse:school-summary-grade-9-6. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
research:st-pauls:2025:six-school-audit:gcse-igcse:school-summary-grade-9-6

Result period: 2025. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗