Back to comparison

St Paul’s School · 2021

GCSE/IGCSE · published record · 2021 · GCSE/IGCSE

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 2 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

2021 is the assessed cohort, not examined results. The booklet calls these Centre Assessed Grades; preserve that source wording alongside the year, without treating it as normal examinations. Rounded school headline. Separate detailed subject table retained; no rounding-based correction to frozen values.

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
2021 is the assessed cohort, not examined results. The booklet calls these Centre Assessed Grades; preserve that source wording alongside the year, without treating it as normal examinations. Rounded school headline. Separate detailed subject table retained; no rounding-based correction to frozen values.
% grade 9 · %
81
% grades 9–8 · %
94
Qualification
GCSE/IGCSE
Note
2021 is the assessed cohort, not examined results. The booklet calls these Centre Assessed Grades; preserve that source wording alongside the year, without treating it as normal examinations. Rounded school headline. Separate detailed subject table retained; no rounding-based correction to frozen values.
Population basis
2021 qualification subject entries
Subject
All subjects · published rounded headline
Year
2021
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

These grades were awarded during the 2020–2021 exam cancellations and are kept separate from exam-year comparisons.

This record has a different scope from the school-wide comparison series.

Where was this published?

Can I compare this figure?

% grade 9 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; assessment-regime exclusion

Reported value: 81. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Numbered grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE 9–1.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% grades 9–8 · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; assessment-regime exclusion

Reported value: 94. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Numbered grade entries. Recorded total for this measure: Unknown / not recorded. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: GCSE / IGCSE 9–1.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

Research context, reference history and record codes

2021 is the assessed cohort, not examined results. The booklet calls these Centre Assessed Grades; preserve that source wording alongside the year, without treating it as normal examinations. Rounded school headline. Separate detailed subject table retained; no rounding-based correction to frozen values.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: research:st-pauls:2021:annual-information:gcse-headlines. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
research:st-pauls:2021:annual-information:gcse-headlines

Result period: 2021. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗