Back to comparison

St Mary’s School Ascot · 2010

University acceptances · published record · 2010 · University acceptances

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 1 field. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

University-published acceptances by UCAS school and cycle from the FOI workbook. UCAS cycle named for entry in that year or deferred entry in the following year (Guide rows17–34). Undergraduate UCAS applications; Astrophoria Foundation Year and Graduate Entry Medicine excluded. Applications lacking UCAS school ID excluded (Guide rows37–42). Meeting offer conditions and firmly accepting a place to begin study; small numbers may not enrol because of late withdrawal or deferral. This is not an enrolment or school destination count (Guide row40). The table is not a destination register or an admissions probability.

Type of result: acceptances.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
University-published acceptances by UCAS school and cycle from the FOI workbook. UCAS cycle named for entry in that year or deferred entry in the following year (Guide rows17–34). Undergraduate UCAS applications; Astrophoria Foundation Year and Graduate Entry Medicine excluded. Applications lacking UCAS school ID excluded (Guide rows37–42). Meeting offer conditions and firmly accepting a place to begin study; small numbers may not enrol because of late withdrawal or deferral. This is not an enrolment or school destination count (Guide row40). The table is not a destination register or an admissions probability.
Published count bound
<3
University
University of Oxford
Qualification
University acceptances
Note
Original printed token: <3. The dated university letter defines the literal <3 token as suppressed counts of 3 or fewer, including zero. Preserve the printed token and this 0–3 disclosure-band definition; do not interpret it mathematically as 0–2 or infer hidden values. Most recent school name for the UCAS school ID is shown, not necessarily the name used in the source year (Guide row41). Identity checked by UCAS school ID, school name, country, postcode and independent-school group.
Outcome type
acceptances
Population basis
UCAS school 10039; St Marys School, Ascot; 2010 Oxford undergraduate cycle acceptances, not the school leaver cohort
Publication status
FOI original workbook checked; 2024 and 2025 cycles not verified from an original
Year
2010
Publication note

FOI original workbook checked; 2024 and 2025 cycles not verified from an original

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

Original printed token: <3. The dated university letter defines the literal <3 token as suppressed counts of 3 or fewer, including zero. Preserve the printed token and this 0–3 disclosure-band definition; do not interpret it mathematically as 0–2 or infer hidden values. Most recent school name for the UCAS school ID is shown, not necessarily the name used in the source year (Guide row41). Identity checked by UCAS school ID, school name, country, postcode and independent-school group.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: research:st-marys-ascot:2010:oxford-apply-centre:acceptances. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
research:st-marys-ascot:2010:oxford-apply-centre:acceptances

Result period: 2010. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗