Back to comparison

Radley College · 2013

AS-level · published record · 2013 · AS-level

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 2 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Original academic report; Retrospective 2013 AS result. RetrospectiveAS results, notA2.

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

A
70
% A–B grades
90.4
Published basis
Original academic report; Retrospective 2013 AS result. RetrospectiveAS results, notA2.
Qualification
AS-level
Note
Original academic report; Retrospective 2013 AS result. RetrospectiveAS results, notA2.
Population basis
published grade entries, unless explicitly described as candidates
Year
2013
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Checked against the original publication

% A–B grades · 2013. Value: 90.4.

The Radleian 2014, Academic Report · Printed page 30, Academic Report

Checked 2026-09-06.

Research context, reference history and record codes

Original academic report; Retrospective 2013 AS result. RetrospectiveAS results, notA2.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: research:radley:2013:radleian-382002-32:retrospective-as-level. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
research:radley:2013:radleian-382002-32:retrospective-as-level

Result period: 2013. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗