Back to comparison

Radley College · 2012

AS-level · published record · 2012 · AS-level

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 1 field. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Original DfE2011/12 underlying subject-results workbook, KS5 population. Source qualification: GCE AS level. Number entered is the published subject-entry count, not a school-wide pupil denominator. AS data use the end-of-KS5 population and include AS awards even when A2 was taken; they do not describe all Year12 entrants. Suppressed grade fields stay suppressed; no inference from totals or another source. No result is the source’s combined ungraded/absent/disqualified/incomplete/no-result category; it is not necessarily gradeU. No school total, percentage or cross-source aggregate calculated.

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
Original DfE2011/12 underlying subject-results workbook, KS5 population. Source qualification: GCE AS level. Number entered is the published subject-entry count, not a school-wide pupil denominator. AS data use the end-of-KS5 population and include AS awards even when A2 was taken; they do not describe all Year12 entrants. Suppressed grade fields stay suppressed; no inference from totals or another source. No result is the source’s combined ungraded/absent/disqualified/incomplete/no-result category; it is not necessarily gradeU. No school total, percentage or cross-source aggregate calculated.
Entries
4
Qualification
AS-level
Grades not available for this qualification
Note
Original DfE2011/12 underlying subject-results workbook, KS5 population. Source qualification: GCE AS level. Number entered is the published subject-entry count, not a school-wide pupil denominator. AS data use the end-of-KS5 population and include AS awards even when A2 was taken; they do not describe all Year12 entrants. Suppressed grade fields stay suppressed; no inference from totals or another source. No result is the source’s combined ungraded/absent/disqualified/incomplete/no-result category; it is not necessarily gradeU. No school total, percentage or cross-source aggregate calculated.
Population basis
KS5 source-defined subject entrants
Qualification label in original publication
GCE AS level
Subject
German
Suppressed source grade fields · no values inferred
A; B; C; D; E; No result
Year
2012
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

Original DfE2011/12 underlying subject-results workbook, KS5 population. Source qualification: GCE AS level. Number entered is the published subject-entry count, not a school-wide pupil denominator. AS data use the end-of-KS5 population and include AS awards even when A2 was taken; they do not describe all Year12 entrants. Suppressed grade fields stay suppressed; no inference from totals or another source. No result is the source’s combined ungraded/absent/disqualified/incomplete/no-result category; it is not necessarily gradeU. No school total, percentage or cross-source aggregate calculated.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: research:radley:2012:dfe:ks5:as:30668. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
research:radley:2012:dfe:ks5:as:30668

Result period: 2012. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗