Back to comparison

St Mary’s School Ascot · 2022

University destinations · published record · 2022 · University destinations

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 3 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Four post-applicants separately reported, one Oxbridge and three other Russell Group places.

Type of result: destinations.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Additional Russell Group places · stated subgroup
3
Published basis
Four post-applicants separately reported, one Oxbridge and three other Russell Group places.
Institution
Prior-year school leavers, application cohort2022
Qualification
University destinations
Note
Prior leaving years unknown; separate from current UVI59 pupils.
Outcome type
destinations
Oxford or Cambridge places · combined institutions, stated stage
1
Post A-level applicants · stated subgroup
4
Year
2022
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

Prior leaving years unknown; separate from current UVI59 pupils.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:st-marys-ascot:2022:postapp-group:governors-report. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
new:st-marys-ascot:2022:postapp-group:governors-report

Result period: 2022. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗