St Mary’s School Ascot · 2010

University offers · published record · 2010 · University offers

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 1 field. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

USA applicants received a total of20 offers.

Type of result: offers.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis: USA applicants received a total of20 offers.
Institution: USA universities
Qualification: University offers
Note: Offers can exceed pupils; no20-pupil group is inferred.
Outcome type: offers
Stated count: 20
Year: 2010

Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Checked against the original publication

Stated count · 2010.

St Mary’s School Ascot: Governors’ report for year ended 31 August 2010 · PDF page 12, printed page 10, Pupil numbers and academic achievement

Checked 2026-09-06.

Research context, reference history and record codes

Offers can exceed pupils; no20-pupil group is inferred.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

NEW_STMARY_ACCOUNTS_2010_1975F1F4 · St Mary’s School Ascot: Governors’ report for year ended 31 August 2010

Original record identifier: new:st-marys-ascot:2010:usa-total-offers:governors-report. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence: P
Record Id: new:st-marys-ascot:2010:usa-total-offers:governors-report

Result period: 2010. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.