Back to comparison

North London Collegiate School · 2020

GCSE combined grades · published record · 2020 · GCSE combined grades

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 2 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Original PDF page5, printed GCSE headline bands.

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

% A* 9 8
95.5
% A* 9 8 a 7
99.7
Published basis
Original PDF page5, printed GCSE headline bands.
Qualification
GCSE combined grades
Note
Includes letter/numerical qualification bands as printed. Never recoded as pure 9–8 or 9–7. Assessment method must be read separately for each qualification; publication does not establish examined comparability.
Year
2020
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

Includes letter/numerical qualification bands as printed. Never recoded as pure 9–8 or 9–7. Assessment method must be read separately for each qualification; publication does not establish examined comparability.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:nlcs:2020:gcse-combined-grades:mixed-gcse-headline. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
new:nlcs:2020:gcse-combined-grades:mixed-gcse-headline

Result period: 2020. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗