North London Collegiate School · 1995
GCSE/IGCSE · published record · 1995 · GCSE/IGCSE
Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.
Original-publication checks are recorded for 1 field. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.
Report a problem with this figure
Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.
Published original annual report values; retrospective table years remain distinct from filing year.
Type of result: Examination results.
The reported values
Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.
- % A*–C · %
- 100
- Published basis
- Published original annual report values; retrospective table years remain distinct from filing year.
- Qualification
- GCSE/IGCSE
- Note
- Published GCSE A*–C result; no entry or candidate denominator supplied.
- Year
- 1995
Publication note
Primary
Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record
Where was this published?
Checked against the original publication
% A*–C · 1995.
North London Collegiate School annual report and accounts, year ended 1995 · PDF page7, annual-results, year1995
Checked 2026-09-06.
Research context, reference history and record codes
Published GCSE A*–C result; no entry or candidate denominator supplied.
These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.
ACC_NLCS_1995_355FEC19· North London Collegiate School annual report and accounts, year ended 1995
Original record identifier: new:nlcs:1995:accounts:gcse-igcse:annual-results:1995. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.
- Evidence
- P
- Record Id
- new:nlcs:1995:accounts:gcse-igcse:annual-results:1995
Result period: 1995. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.