Back to comparison

Magdalen College School · 2019

A-level/Pre-U combined · published record · 2019 · A-level/Pre-U combined

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 1 field. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Pupils with three or more A* grades as printed

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
Pupils with three or more A* grades as printed
Qualification
A-level/Pre-U combined
Note
Pupil count is distinct from grade entries. The annual report calls these A Level/A2 results; later reports explicitly include Pre-U conversion for this historical period. No pure A-level eligibility is inferred.
Pupils three or more A* count
38
Year
2019
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

Pupil count is distinct from grade entries. The annual report calls these A Level/A2 results; later reports explicitly include Pre-U conversion for this historical period. No pure A-level eligibility is inferred.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:mcs-oxford:2019:three-top-grades:governors-2019. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
new:mcs-oxford:2019:three-top-grades:governors-2019

Result period: 2019. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗