Magdalen College School · 2005
A-level · published record · 2005 · A-level
Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.
Original-publication checks are recorded for 1 field. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.
Report a problem with this figure
Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.
School-published pupil achievement thresholds
Type of result: Examination results.
The reported values
Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.
- Published basis
- School-published pupil achievement thresholds
- Qualification
- A-level
- Note
- Overlapping thresholds are not summed; grade-entry totals are not inferred from pupil achievements.
- Pupils with seven A grades
- 1
- Year
- 2005
Publication note
Primary
Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record
Where was this published?
Checked against the original publication
Pupils with seven A grades · 2005.
Magdalen College School Oxford: governors/directors report for year ended 31 July 2005 · PDF pages 5; academic achievement and university outcomes
Checked 2026-09-06.
Research context, reference history and record codes
Overlapping thresholds are not summed; grade-entry totals are not inferred from pupil achievements.
These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.
NEW_MCS_ACCOUNTS_2005_E670A4A9· Magdalen College School Oxford: governors/directors report for year ended 31 July 2005
Original record identifier: new:mcs-oxford:2005:a-level-pupil-thresholds:governors-2005. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.
- Evidence
- P
- Record Id
- new:mcs-oxford:2005:a-level-pupil-thresholds:governors-2005
Result period: 2005. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.