Downe House · 2024

GCSE/IGCSE · published record · 2024 · GCSE/IGCSE · 9-1

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 1 field. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Published percentages of GCSE passes; not all entries

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis: Published percentages of GCSE passes; not all entries
Grade 9 7 Of Passes: 75
Qualification: GCSE/IGCSE
Note: Pass denominator must not be silently substituted for all grades. Results-day publication precedes a promised fuller October overview.
Grade scale: 9-1
Year: 2024

Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Checked against the original publication

Grade 9 7 Of Passes · 2024.

Downe House GCSE results 2024 · Overall results paragraph; percentages explicitly of passes

Checked 2026-09-06.

Research context, reference history and record codes

Pass denominator must not be silently substituted for all grades. Results-day publication precedes a promised fuller October overview.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

NEW_2D2B068AC31D · Downe House GCSE results 2024

Original record identifier: new:downe-house:2024:gcse-igcse:results-day. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence: P
Record Id: new:downe-house:2024:gcse-igcse:results-day

Result period: 2024. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.