Back to comparison

City of London School · 2012

A-level · published record · 2012 · A-level

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 15 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Published qualification-specific grade entries and percentages in the original subject table.

Type of result: Examination results.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

A count
219
% A*–A · %
78.64
% A*–B · %
97.05
A* count
127
Average points per entry · source-era scale
120.6
B count
81
Published basis
Published qualification-specific grade entries and percentages in the original subject table.
C count
10
Candidates
130
D count
2
E count
1
Entries
440
Qualification
A-level
Note
Printed grade zeros and missing cells are distinct; no blank is filled. This table does not include Pre-U. Candidate count is independently printed beneath the total. Cohort aggregate must not be used as a calendar-year-only sum where earlier exams are included. prior_ fields are the table’s previous-cohort comparison columns, not new subject counts; early-exam row labels do not automatically date those comparison figures.
Published pass rate · grade band stated with observation
100.0
A*–E grade entries
440
Prior a star a
67.13
Prior a star b
90.74
Subject
TOTAL
Year
2012
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

The record does not establish which group this figure counts.

This record has a different scope from the school-wide comparison series.

Where was this published?

15 publication checks are recorded for this figure. The 4 most recently accessed are shown; the rest are one disclosure away, not removed.

Read the other 11 publication checks

Can I compare this figure?

% A*–A · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; unknown population basis

Reported value: 78.64. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Unknown. Recorded total for this measure: 440. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: A-level post-2010 A*–E.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

% A*–B · research observation outside matched schoolwide scope; incompatible definitions; unknown population basis

Reported value: 97.05. 0 decimal places. Unit: percent.

Group counted: Unknown. Recorded total for this measure: 440. Type of result: Grade awards. Grading system: A-level post-2010 A*–E.

A usable individual value still needs duplicate, publication-version and matched-year checks before it enters a comparison.

Original source code: P. Numerical classification: exact.

Research context, reference history and record codes

Printed grade zeros and missing cells are distinct; no blank is filled. This table does not include Pre-U. Candidate count is independently printed beneath the total. Cohort aggregate must not be used as a calendar-year-only sum where earlier exams are included. prior_ fields are the table’s previous-cohort comparison columns, not new subject counts; early-exam row labels do not automatically date those comparison figures.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:city-of-london:2012:a-level:governance-2012-total. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
new:city-of-london:2012:a-level:governance-2012-total

Result period: 2012. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗