Back to comparison

Brighton College · 1995

University offers · published record · 1995 · University offers

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 1 field. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Published University offers summary in 1995 annual, PDF page 10

Type of result: place statements.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
Published University offers summary in 1995 annual, PDF page 10
Count
11
Institution
Oxford and Cambridge
Qualification
University offers
Note
The text says 11 candidates have won places at Oxford and Cambridge for next year; admission conditions and exact future entry year are not specified. Recorded as place statements, not final destinations.
Outcome type
place statements
Year
1995
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

The text says 11 candidates have won places at Oxford and Cambridge for next year; admission conditions and exact future entry year are not specified. Recorded as place statements, not final destinations.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:brighton:1995:university-offers:brightonian1995. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
new:brighton:1995:university-offers:brightonian1995

Result period: 1995. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗