City of London School: comparable GCSE figures, 2005

No figure

GCSE top grades (A* or 9–8) · Comparable figure · our calculation

We don’t have City of London’s whole-school lettered GCSE figure for 2005.

The original grades

A*–G: no full grade table in this record

This year’s exams: A*–G GCSEs only.

We know because the qualification is the only one it could be.

The comparison, the school’s headline and the original grades
Grade band	Comparable figure (our calculation)	The school’s figure (as the school published it)	Original grades
GCSE high grades (A*–A or 9–7)	No figureThe school’s own tables don’t give a comparable figure for this year.	No combined figure from the school	—
GCSE top grades (A* or 9–8)	No figureThe school’s own tables don’t give a comparable figure for this year.	No combined figure from the school	—
GCSE C/4 or better (A*–C or 9–4)	No figureThe school’s own tables don’t give a comparable figure for this year.	No combined figure from the school	—
GCSE grade 9 (9–1 entries only)	No figure	No combined figure from the school	—

How the figure is calculated

The number of entries at or above the band, across every exam system, divided by all the entries. We never average two percentages.

Record details

Record ID harm:v1:city-of-london:2005:gcse. Quote it if you report a problem.

The record’s own wording, where this page puts it in plainer words.

High grades: reason: GCSE/IGCSE A*–G: Held: the Gazette summary used here marks the 2005 results preliminary, with re-marks pending (78.6% A*–A), and the governors’ later reports give 79.3%.
High grades: reason codes: comparable figure not computable
Top grades: reason: GCSE/IGCSE A*–G: Held: the Gazette summary used here marks the 2005 results preliminary, with re-marks pending (78.6% A*–A), and the governors’ later reports give 79.3%.
Top grades: reason codes: comparable figure not computable
C/4+: reason: GCSE/IGCSE A*–G: Held: the Gazette summary used here marks the 2005 results preliminary, with re-marks pending (78.6% A*–A), and the governors’ later reports give 79.3%.
C/4+: reason codes: comparable figure not computable
Grade 9: reason: No entries were graded 9–1 this year, so there is no grade-9 figure.
A*–G: why no figure: Held: the Gazette summary used here marks the 2005 results preliminary, with re-marks pending (78.6% A*–A), and the governors’ later reports give 79.3%.
Which exams were sat: evidence: A*-G: 2 school or ISC records (e.g. new:city-of-london:2005:gazette-archive:gcse-igcse:preliminary-summary:45ac489a0fdf)
Which exams were sat: evidence: GCSE 9–1 was first awarded in 2017, so every entry was graded A*–G.

Method: harm-v1 1.0.0
Inputs digest: sha256:961254bfaf3a08633c2a7ea47d443dce56ac102a7eeec7f7c6dd6c92a125bac8
Qualification mix: A*-G (by-definition)