Back to comparison

St Mary’s School Ascot · 2016

University offers · published record · 2016 · University offers

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 1 field. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

The report describes9 receiving offers from Oxford and Cambridge colleges and Medical Schools.

Type of result: offers.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
The report describes9 receiving offers from Oxford and Cambridge colleges and Medical Schools.
Institution
Oxford and Cambridge colleges and Medical Schools
Qualification
University offers
Note
Scope of the combined institutional/course phrase is unresolved. Do not relabel the number as an Oxbridge-only total.
Outcome type
offers
Stated count
9
Year
2016
Publication note

Definition unresolved

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

Scope of the combined institutional/course phrase is unresolved. Do not relabel the number as an Oxbridge-only total.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:st-marys-ascot:2016:oxbridge-medical-offer-description:governors-report. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
Definition unresolved
Record Id
new:st-marys-ascot:2016:oxbridge-medical-offer-description:governors-report

Result period: 2016. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗