Back to comparison

St Mary’s School Ascot · 2002

University destinations · published record · 2002 · University destinations

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 2 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Combined Oxford/Cambridge number in the annual leaver/higher-education discussion.

Type of result: expected destination statement.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
Combined Oxford/Cambridge number in the annual leaver/higher-education discussion.
Institution
Oxford and Cambridge
Qualification
University destinations
Note
Reports2002–2005 explicitly describe expected progression. No university split or confirmed enrolment is inferred.
Outcome type
expected destination statement
School leaver population as stated
42
Stated count
9
Year
2002
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

Reports2002–2005 explicitly describe expected progression. No university split or confirmed enrolment is inferred.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:st-marys-ascot:2002:oxbridge-destination-description:governors-report. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
new:st-marys-ascot:2002:oxbridge-destination-description:governors-report

Result period: 2002. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗