Back to comparison

Magdalen College School · 2025

University destinations · published record · 2025 · University destinations

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 3 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

Published destinations highlights, version dated 23 September 2025

Type of result: destinations.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
Published destinations highlights, version dated 23 September 2025
Qualification
University destinations
Medicine or dentistry pupils
13
Note
Oxford/Cambridge and Ivy League are one combined group and cannot be split. Medicine/Dentistry overlaps institutional groups; no total cohort supplied.
Other russell group pupils
111
Outcome type
destinations
Oxbridge or ivy league pupils
26
Year
2025
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

Oxford/Cambridge and Ivy League are one combined group and cannot be split. Medicine/Dentistry overlaps institutional groups; no total cohort supplied.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:mcs-oxford:2025:university-destinations:dated-pdf-headline. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
new:mcs-oxford:2025:university-destinations:dated-pdf-headline

Result period: 2025. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗