Back to comparison

City of London School · 2013

University destinations · published record · 2013 · University destinations

Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.

Original-publication checks are recorded for 3 fields. This does not verify every field or every interpretation of the record; inspect the field-specific checks below.

Report a problem with this figure

Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.

What does this figure tell me?

School-published destinations observation.

Type of result: destinations.

The reported values

Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.

Published basis
School-published destinations observation.
Published denominator · population stated with observation
99
Institution
London institutions
Qualification
University destinations
Note
The individually listed institution counts sum 24; the headline is 25. No missing allocation is inferred.
Outcome type
destinations
Published percentage · population definition unresolved
25
Stated count
25
Year
2013
Publication note

Primary

Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record

Where was this published?

Research context, reference history and record codes

The individually listed institution counts sum 24; the headline is 25. No missing allocation is inferred.

These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.

Original record identifier: new:city-of-london:2013:university-destinations:governance-london-institutions-destinations. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.

Evidence
P
Record Id
new:city-of-london:2013:university-destinations:governance-london-institutions-destinations

Result period: 2013. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.

Source evidenceOpen full record ↗