St Paul’s School · 2014
Cambridge and combined Oxbridge cycles · 2014
Check what this figure counts, where it was published and any limits on comparing it with another result.
No adequate source description or original-publication check is presently held in this public record. Any reference keys are retained for further research.
Report a problem with this figure
Opens an email to corrections@theschoolsrecord.co.uk with this record filled in, or prepare a fuller report.
strict UCAS/apply-centre Cambridge rows and same-cycle combined cross-check
Type of result: University applications.
The reported values
Values keep the precision of the source. “Not recorded” does not mean zero. One pupil may have several subject entries or university offers.
- Cambridge
- Accepted / admitted outcomes: 24; Applications: 59; Evidence: P; Note: Unknown / not recorded; Offers: 28
- Cycle
- 2014
- Oxford
- Accepted / admitted outcomes: 29; Applications: 88; Offers: 32
- Combined Oxbridge
- Accepted / admitted outcomes: 53; Applications: 147; Applications Complete: Yes; Offers: 60
Publication note
Not stated
Back to this school’s records · Link to this source record
We have not recorded a check of the original publication for this particular figure. The references below may cover other results in the same collection.
Research context, reference history and record codes
Sparse by design outside schools/years for which Cambridge released apply-centre data.
These references may support other years or fields in the same dataset. They do not replace the observation-specific checks above.
FB13· Publication title not recorded · public link not established · controlling full-table baseFB146· Publication title not recorded · public link not established · latest seven-school companion and Wayback/destination lock
Original record identifier: fig:cambridge_and_combined_st_paul_s_school:4. Source codes are retained for reproducibility.
Result period: 2014. A source-check date records when the publication was checked; it is not a new results year. Something wrong here? Report a problem with this figure.